perf test: Clarify some error reports in the open syscall test

Rebooted my devel machine, first thing I ran was perf test, that expects
debugfs to be mounted, test fails. Be more clear about it.

Also add missing newlines and add more informative message when
sys_perf_event_open fails.

Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 74d91e3c
......@@ -268,24 +268,26 @@ static int test__open_syscall_event(void)
int id = trace_event__id("sys_enter_open");
if (id < 0) {
pr_debug("trace_event__id(\"sys_enter_open\") ");
pr_debug("is debugfs mounted on /sys/kernel/debug?\n");
return -1;
}
threads = thread_map__new(-1, getpid());
if (threads == NULL) {
pr_debug("thread_map__new ");
pr_debug("thread_map__new\n");
return -1;
}
evsel = perf_evsel__new(PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, id, 0);
if (evsel == NULL) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__new ");
pr_debug("perf_evsel__new\n");
goto out_thread_map_delete;
}
if (perf_evsel__open_per_thread(evsel, threads) < 0) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__open_per_thread ");
pr_debug("failed to open counter: %s, "
"tweak /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid?\n",
strerror(errno));
goto out_evsel_delete;
}
......@@ -295,13 +297,15 @@ static int test__open_syscall_event(void)
}
if (perf_evsel__read_on_cpu(evsel, 0, 0) < 0) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__open_read_on_cpu ");
pr_debug("perf_evsel__open_read_on_cpu\n");
goto out_close_fd;
}
if (evsel->counts->cpu[0].val != nr_open_calls)
pr_debug("perf_evsel__read_on_cpu: expected to intercept %d calls, got %Ld ",
if (evsel->counts->cpu[0].val != nr_open_calls) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__read_on_cpu: expected to intercept %d calls, got %Ld\n",
nr_open_calls, evsel->counts->cpu[0].val);
goto out_close_fd;
}
err = 0;
out_close_fd:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment