Commit 4565af0d authored by LEROY Christophe's avatar LEROY Christophe Committed by David S. Miller

net: optimise csum_replace4()

csum_partial() is a generic function which is not optimised for small fixed
length calculations, and its use requires to store "from" and "to" values in
memory while we already have them available in registers. This also has impact,
especially on RISC processors. In the same spirit as the change done by
Eric Dumazet on csum_replace2(), this patch rewrites inet_proto_csum_replace4()
taking into account RFC1624.

I spotted during a NATted tcp transfert that csum_partial() is one of top 5
consuming functions (around 8%), and the second user of csum_partial() is
inet_proto_csum_replace4().

I have proposed the same modification to inet_proto_csum_replace4() in another
patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Acked-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3290d655
......@@ -122,9 +122,7 @@ static inline __wsum csum_partial_ext(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
static inline void csum_replace4(__sum16 *sum, __be32 from, __be32 to)
{
__be32 diff[] = { ~from, to };
*sum = csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff), ~csum_unfold(*sum)));
*sum = csum_fold(csum_add(csum_sub(~csum_unfold(*sum), from), to));
}
/* Implements RFC 1624 (Incremental Internet Checksum)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment