Commit 48ca6243 authored by Stanislav Fomichev's avatar Stanislav Fomichev Committed by Daniel Borkmann

selftests/bpf: Properly initialize linfo in sockmap_basic

When using -Werror=missing-braces, compiler complains about missing braces.
Let's use use ={} initialization which should do the job:

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c: In function 'test_sockmap_iter':
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:181:8: error: missing braces around initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]
  union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0};
        ^
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:181:8: error: (near initialization for 'linfo.map') [-Werror=missing-braces]
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c: At top level:
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201002000451.1794044-1-sdf@google.com
parent cffcdbff
...@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void test_sockmap_copy(enum bpf_map_type map_type) ...@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void test_sockmap_copy(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
{ {
DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts); DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
int err, len, src_fd, iter_fd, duration = 0; int err, len, src_fd, iter_fd, duration = 0;
union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0}; union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {};
__u32 i, num_sockets, num_elems; __u32 i, num_sockets, num_elems;
struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel; struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel;
__s64 *sock_fd = NULL; __s64 *sock_fd = NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment