Merge branch 'RISC-V selftest/bpf fixes'

Björn Töpel says:

====================

This series contain some fixes for selftests/bpf when building/running
on a RISC-V host. Details can be found in each individual commit.

v2:
  Makefile cosmetics. (Andrii)
  Simplified unpriv check and added comment. (Andrii)
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile

@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS): $(BPFOBJ) | $(BUILD_DIR)/resolve_btfids	\
 # build would have failed anyways.
 define get_sys_includes
 $(shell $(1) -v -E - </dev/null 2>&1 \
-	| sed -n '/<...> search starts here:/,/End of search list./{ s| \(/.*\)|-idirafter \1|p }')
+	| sed -n '/<...> search starts here:/,/End of search list./{ s| \(/.*\)|-idirafter \1|p }') \
+$(shell $(1) -dM -E - </dev/null | grep '#define __riscv_xlen ' | sed 's/#define /-D/' | sed 's/ /=/')
 endef
 
 # Determine target endianness.

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c

@@ -1152,6 +1152,19 @@ static void get_unpriv_disabled()
 
 static bool test_as_unpriv(struct bpf_test *test)
 {
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+	/* Some architectures have strict alignment requirements. In
+	 * that case, the BPF verifier detects if a program has
+	 * unaligned accesses and rejects them. A user can pass
+	 * BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT to a program to override this
+	 * check. That, however, will only work when a privileged user
+	 * loads a program. An unprivileged user loading a program
+	 * with this flag will be rejected prior entering the
+	 * verifier.
+	 */
+	if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+		return false;
+#endif
 	return !test->prog_type ||
 	       test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER ||
 	       test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB;

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c

@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_ip4 field",
@@ -292,6 +293,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field",
@@ -305,6 +307,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_ip4 field",
@@ -331,6 +334,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_port field",
@@ -344,6 +348,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 /* invalid 1,2,4-byte reads from 8-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {
@@ -410,6 +415,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at even offset",
@@ -422,6 +428,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 /* in-bound and out-of-bound writes to bpf_sk_lookup */
 {

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"direct map access, write test 7",
@@ -195,6 +196,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 },
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"direct map access, write test 17",
@@ -209,6 +211,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 },
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"direct map access, write test 18",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 	.errstr_unpriv = "bpf_array access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c

@@ -31,4 +31,5 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1, },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE,
 	.errstr = "R6 invalid variable buffer offset: off=0, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c

@@ -675,6 +675,7 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid mem access",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock() after release",
@@ -698,6 +699,7 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid mem access",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock(tp) after release",
@@ -725,6 +727,7 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid mem access",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"reference tracking: use sk after bpf_sk_release(tp)",
@@ -747,6 +750,7 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid mem access",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_get_listener_sock() after bpf_sk_release(sk)",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc negative",
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc src_reg negative",
@@ -97,6 +99,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc and spill",
@@ -126,6 +129,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc and spill negative",
@@ -156,6 +160,7 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=8",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc three regs",
@@ -182,6 +187,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc after call",
@@ -210,6 +216,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc in callee",
@@ -240,6 +247,7 @@
 	.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"regalloc, spill, JEQ",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c

-#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err) \
+#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err, flgs)	\
 { \
 	"wide store to bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \
 	.insns = { \
@@ -11,31 +11,36 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \
 	.errstr = err, \
+	.flags = flgs, \
 }
 
 /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT,
-		    NULL),
+		    NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 1, REJECT,
-		    "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"),
+		    "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT,
-		    NULL),
+		    NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 3, REJECT,
-		    "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"),
+		    "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 
 /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT,
-		    "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"),
+		    "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT,
-		    NULL),
+		    NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT,
-		    "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"),
+		    "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT,
-		    "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"),
+		    "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0),
 
 #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE
 
-#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err) \
+#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err, flgs)	\
 { \
 	"wide load from bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \
 	.insns = { \
@@ -48,26 +53,31 @@ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \
 	.errstr = err, \
+	.flags = flgs, \
 }
 
 /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT,
-		   NULL),
+		   NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 1, REJECT,
-		   "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"),
+		   "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT,
-		   NULL),
+		   NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 3, REJECT,
-		   "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"),
+		   "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 
 /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT,
-		   "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"),
+		   "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT,
-		   NULL),
+		   NULL, 0),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT,
-		   "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"),
+		   "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8",
+		    F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),
 BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT,
-		   "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"),
+		   "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0),
 
 #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD