Commit 4f8c19fd authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Al Viro

inode: remove iprune_sem

Now that we have per-sb shrinkers with a lifecycle that is a subset
of the superblock lifecycle and can reliably detect a filesystem
being unmounted, there is not longer any race condition for the
iprune_sem to protect against. Hence we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent b0d40c92
......@@ -67,17 +67,6 @@ static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_hash_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_sb_list_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_wb_list_lock);
/*
* iprune_sem provides exclusion between the icache shrinking and the
* umount path.
*
* We don't actually need it to protect anything in the umount path,
* but only need to cycle through it to make sure any inode that
* prune_icache_sb took off the LRU list has been fully torn down by the
* time we are past evict_inodes.
*/
static DECLARE_RWSEM(iprune_sem);
/*
* Empty aops. Can be used for the cases where the user does not
* define any of the address_space operations.
......@@ -542,14 +531,6 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
/*
* Cycle through iprune_sem to make sure any inode that prune_icache_sb
* moved off the list before we took the lock has been fully torn
* down.
*/
down_write(&iprune_sem);
up_write(&iprune_sem);
}
/**
......@@ -635,7 +616,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
int nr_scanned;
unsigned long reap = 0;
down_read(&iprune_sem);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
for (nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; nr_scanned >= 0; nr_scanned--) {
struct inode *inode;
......@@ -711,7 +691,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
dispose_list(&freeable);
up_read(&iprune_sem);
}
static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment