Commit 5337a8ba authored by Chuck Lever's avatar Chuck Lever Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

xprtrdma: Remove FMRs from the unmap list after unmapping

commit 38f1932e upstream.

ib_unmap_fmr() takes a list of FMRs to unmap. However, it does not
remove the FMRs from this list as it processes them. Other
ib_unmap_fmr() call sites are careful to remove FMRs from the list
after ib_unmap_fmr() returns.

Since commit 7c7a5390 ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR")
fmr_op_unmap_sync passes more than one FMR to ib_unmap_fmr(), but
it didn't bother to remove the FMRs from that list once the call was
complete.

I've noticed some instability that could be related to list
tangling by the new fmr_op_unmap_sync() logic. In an abundance
of caution, add some defensive logic to clean up properly after
ib_unmap_fmr().

Fixes: 7c7a5390 ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Tested-by: default avatarSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent b3c5b399
......@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ static int
__fmr_unmap(struct rpcrdma_mw *mw)
{
LIST_HEAD(l);
int rc;
list_add(&mw->fmr.fmr->list, &l);
return ib_unmap_fmr(&l);
rc = ib_unmap_fmr(&l);
list_del_init(&mw->fmr.fmr->list);
return rc;
}
/* Deferred reset of a single FMR. Generate a fresh rkey by
......@@ -267,7 +270,7 @@ fmr_op_unmap_sync(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_req *req)
seg = &req->rl_segments[i];
mw = seg->rl_mw;
list_add(&mw->fmr.fmr->list, &unmap_list);
list_add_tail(&mw->fmr.fmr->list, &unmap_list);
i += seg->mr_nsegs;
}
......@@ -280,7 +283,9 @@ fmr_op_unmap_sync(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_req *req)
*/
for (i = 0, nchunks = req->rl_nchunks; nchunks; nchunks--) {
seg = &req->rl_segments[i];
mw = seg->rl_mw;
list_del_init(&mw->fmr.fmr->list);
__fmr_dma_unmap(r_xprt, seg);
rpcrdma_put_mw(r_xprt, seg->rl_mw);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment