Commit 53c0441d authored by Jiri Pirko's avatar Jiri Pirko Committed by Jakub Kicinski

dpll: fix possible deadlock during netlink dump operation

Recently, I've been hitting following deadlock warning during dpll pin
dump:

[52804.637962] ======================================================
[52804.638536] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[52804.639111] 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #1 Not tainted
[52804.639529] ------------------------------------------------------
[52804.640104] python3/2984 is trying to acquire lock:
[52804.640581] ffff88810e642678 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780
[52804.641417]
               but task is already holding lock:
[52804.642010] ffffffff83bde4c8 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20
[52804.642747]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[52804.643551]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[52804.644259]
               -> #1 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[52804.644836]        lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0
[52804.645271]        __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150
[52804.645723]        dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20
[52804.646169]        genl_start+0x266/0x320
[52804.646578]        __netlink_dump_start+0x321/0x450
[52804.647056]        genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0
[52804.647575]        genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0
[52804.648001]        netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210
[52804.648440]        genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
[52804.648831]        netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490
[52804.649290]        netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660
[52804.649742]        __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0
[52804.650165]        __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210
[52804.650597]        __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80
[52804.651045]        do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140
[52804.651474]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[52804.652001]
               -> #0 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[52804.652650]        check_prev_add+0x1ae/0x1280
[52804.653107]        __lock_acquire+0x1ed3/0x29a0
[52804.653559]        lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0
[52804.653984]        __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150
[52804.654423]        netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780
[52804.654845]        __netlink_dump_start+0x389/0x450
[52804.655321]        genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0
[52804.655842]        genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0
[52804.656272]        netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210
[52804.656721]        genl_rcv+0x24/0x40
[52804.657119]        netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490
[52804.657570]        netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660
[52804.658022]        __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0
[52804.658450]        __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210
[52804.658877]        __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80
[52804.659322]        do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140
[52804.659752]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[52804.660281]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[52804.661077]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[52804.661671]        CPU0                    CPU1
[52804.662129]        ----                    ----
[52804.662577]   lock(dpll_lock);
[52804.662924]                                lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC);
[52804.663538]                                lock(dpll_lock);
[52804.664073]   lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC);
[52804.664490]

The issue as follows: __netlink_dump_start() calls control->start(cb)
with nlk->cb_mutex held. In control->start(cb) the dpll_lock is taken.
Then nlk->cb_mutex is released and taken again in netlink_dump(), while
dpll_lock still being held. That leads to ABBA deadlock when another
CPU races with the same operation.

Fix this by moving dpll_lock taking into dumpit() callback which ensures
correct lock taking order.

Fixes: 9d71b54b ("dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarArkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240207115902.371649-1-jiri@resnulli.usSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 1f719a2f
......@@ -384,8 +384,6 @@ operations:
- type
dump:
pre: dpll-lock-dumpit
post: dpll-unlock-dumpit
reply: *dev-attrs
-
......@@ -473,8 +471,6 @@ operations:
- fractional-frequency-offset
dump:
pre: dpll-lock-dumpit
post: dpll-unlock-dumpit
request:
attributes:
- id
......
......@@ -1199,6 +1199,7 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
unsigned long i;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
xa_for_each_marked_start(&dpll_pin_xa, i, pin, DPLL_REGISTERED,
ctx->idx) {
if (!dpll_pin_available(pin))
......@@ -1218,6 +1219,8 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
}
genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
}
mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
if (ret == -EMSGSIZE) {
ctx->idx = i;
return skb->len;
......@@ -1373,6 +1376,7 @@ int dpll_nl_device_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
unsigned long i;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
xa_for_each_marked_start(&dpll_device_xa, i, dpll, DPLL_REGISTERED,
ctx->idx) {
hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
......@@ -1389,6 +1393,8 @@ int dpll_nl_device_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
}
genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
}
mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
if (ret == -EMSGSIZE) {
ctx->idx = i;
return skb->len;
......@@ -1439,20 +1445,6 @@ dpll_unlock_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
}
int dpll_lock_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
return 0;
}
int dpll_unlock_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
return 0;
}
int dpll_pin_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct genl_info *info)
{
......
......@@ -95,9 +95,7 @@ static const struct genl_split_ops dpll_nl_ops[] = {
},
{
.cmd = DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_GET,
.start = dpll_lock_dumpit,
.dumpit = dpll_nl_device_get_dumpit,
.done = dpll_unlock_dumpit,
.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
},
{
......@@ -129,9 +127,7 @@ static const struct genl_split_ops dpll_nl_ops[] = {
},
{
.cmd = DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET,
.start = dpll_lock_dumpit,
.dumpit = dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit,
.done = dpll_unlock_dumpit,
.policy = dpll_pin_get_dump_nl_policy,
.maxattr = DPLL_A_PIN_ID,
.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
......
......@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ dpll_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
void
dpll_pin_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct genl_info *info);
int dpll_lock_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
int dpll_unlock_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb);
int dpll_nl_device_id_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
int dpll_nl_device_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment