Commit 576cd320 authored by Russell King's avatar Russell King Committed by David S. Miller

sfp: fix module initialisation with netdev already up

It was been observed that with a particular order of initialisation,
the netdev can be up, but the SFP module still has its TX_DISABLE
signal asserted.  This occurs when the network device brought up before
the SFP kernel module has been inserted by userspace.

This occurs because sfp-bus layer does not hear about the change in
network device state, and so assumes that it is still down.  Set
netdev->sfp when the upstream is registered to work around this problem.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f20a4c46
......@@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ static int sfp_register_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
}
if (bus->started)
bus->socket_ops->start(bus->sfp);
bus->netdev->sfp_bus = bus;
bus->registered = true;
return 0;
}
......@@ -364,7 +363,6 @@ static void sfp_unregister_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
if (bus->phydev && ops && ops->disconnect_phy)
ops->disconnect_phy(bus->upstream);
}
bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
bus->registered = false;
}
......@@ -440,6 +438,7 @@ static void sfp_upstream_clear(struct sfp_bus *bus)
{
bus->upstream_ops = NULL;
bus->upstream = NULL;
bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
bus->netdev = NULL;
}
......@@ -468,6 +467,7 @@ struct sfp_bus *sfp_register_upstream(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
bus->upstream_ops = ops;
bus->upstream = upstream;
bus->netdev = ndev;
ndev->sfp_bus = bus;
if (bus->sfp) {
ret = sfp_register_bus(bus);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment