Commit 59112e9c authored by Jean-Philippe Brucker's avatar Jean-Philippe Brucker Committed by Marc Zyngier

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix a circular locking issue

Lockdep reports a circular lock dependency between the srcu and the
config_lock:

[  262.179917] -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[  262.182010]        __synchronize_srcu+0xb0/0x224
[  262.183422]        synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x24/0x34
[  262.184554]        kvm_io_bus_register_dev+0x324/0x50c
[  262.185650]        vgic_register_redist_iodev+0x254/0x398
[  262.186740]        vgic_v3_set_redist_base+0x3b0/0x724
[  262.188087]        kvm_vgic_addr+0x364/0x600
[  262.189189]        vgic_set_common_attr+0x90/0x544
[  262.190278]        vgic_v3_set_attr+0x74/0x9c
[  262.191432]        kvm_device_ioctl+0x2a0/0x4e4
[  262.192515]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x7ac/0x1ba8
[  262.193612]        invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x70/0x1e0
[  262.195006]        do_el0_svc+0xe4/0x2d4
[  262.195929]        el0_svc+0x44/0x8c
[  262.196917]        el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x120
[  262.198238]        el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
[  262.199224]
[  262.199224] -> #0 (&kvm->arch.config_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  262.201094]        __lock_acquire+0x2b70/0x626c
[  262.202245]        lock_acquire+0x454/0x778
[  262.203132]        __mutex_lock+0x190/0x8b4
[  262.204023]        mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30
[  262.205100]        vgic_mmio_write_v3_misc+0x5c/0x2a0
[  262.206178]        dispatch_mmio_write+0xd8/0x258
[  262.207498]        __kvm_io_bus_write+0x1e0/0x350
[  262.208582]        kvm_io_bus_write+0xe0/0x1cc
[  262.209653]        io_mem_abort+0x2ac/0x6d8
[  262.210569]        kvm_handle_guest_abort+0x9b8/0x1f88
[  262.211937]        handle_exit+0xc4/0x39c
[  262.212971]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x90c/0x1c04
[  262.214154]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x450/0x12f8
[  262.215233]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x7ac/0x1ba8
[  262.216402]        invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x70/0x1e0
[  262.217774]        do_el0_svc+0xe4/0x2d4
[  262.218758]        el0_svc+0x44/0x8c
[  262.219941]        el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x120
[  262.221110]        el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

Note that the current report, which can be triggered by the vgic_irq
kselftest, is a triple chain that includes slots_lock, but after
inverting the slots_lock/config_lock dependency, the actual problem
reported above remains.

In several places, the vgic code calls kvm_io_bus_register_dev(), which
synchronizes the srcu, while holding config_lock (#1). And the MMIO
handler takes the config_lock while holding the srcu read lock (#0).

Break dependency #1, by registering the distributor and redistributors
without holding config_lock. The ITS also uses kvm_io_bus_register_dev()
but already relies on slots_lock to serialize calls.

The distributor iodev is created on the first KVM_RUN call. Multiple
threads will race for vgic initialization, and only the first one will
see !vgic_ready() under the lock. To serialize those threads, rely on
slots_lock rather than config_lock.

Redistributors are created earlier, through KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR
ioctls and vCPU creation. Similarly, serialize the iodev creation with
slots_lock, and the rest with config_lock.

Fixes: f0032773 ("KVM: arm64: Use config_lock to protect vgic state")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230518100914.2837292-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org
parent c3a62df4
......@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* KVM io device for the redistributor that belongs to this VCPU.
*/
if (dist->vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3) {
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->slots_lock);
ret = vgic_register_redist_iodev(vcpu);
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->slots_lock);
}
return ret;
}
......@@ -446,11 +446,13 @@ int vgic_lazy_init(struct kvm *kvm)
int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
gpa_t dist_base;
int ret = 0;
if (likely(vgic_ready(kvm)))
return 0;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
if (vgic_ready(kvm))
goto out;
......@@ -463,13 +465,26 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
else
ret = vgic_v3_map_resources(kvm);
if (ret)
if (ret) {
__kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
else
dist->ready = true;
goto out;
}
dist->ready = true;
dist_base = dist->vgic_dist_base;
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
ret = vgic_register_dist_iodev(kvm, dist_base,
kvm_vgic_global_state.type);
if (ret) {
kvm_err("Unable to register VGIC dist MMIO regions\n");
kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
}
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
return ret;
out:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -102,7 +102,11 @@ static int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr, bool wri
if (get_user(addr, uaddr))
return -EFAULT;
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
/*
* Since we can't hold config_lock while registering the redistributor
* iodevs, take the slots_lock immediately.
*/
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
switch (attr->attr) {
case KVM_VGIC_V2_ADDR_TYPE_DIST:
r = vgic_check_type(kvm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
......@@ -182,6 +186,7 @@ static int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr, bool wri
if (r)
goto out;
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
if (write) {
r = vgic_check_iorange(kvm, *addr_ptr, addr, alignment, size);
if (!r)
......@@ -189,9 +194,10 @@ static int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr, bool wri
} else {
addr = *addr_ptr;
}
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
out:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
if (!r && !write)
r = put_user(addr, uaddr);
......
......@@ -769,10 +769,13 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct vgic_io_device *rd_dev = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.rd_iodev;
struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
gpa_t rd_base;
int ret;
int ret = 0;
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
if (!IS_VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF(vgic_cpu->rd_iodev.base_addr))
return 0;
goto out_unlock;
/*
* We may be creating VCPUs before having set the base address for the
......@@ -782,10 +785,12 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
rdreg = vgic_v3_rdist_free_slot(&vgic->rd_regions);
if (!rdreg)
return 0;
goto out_unlock;
if (!vgic_v3_check_base(kvm))
return -EINVAL;
if (!vgic_v3_check_base(kvm)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
vgic_cpu->rdreg = rdreg;
vgic_cpu->rdreg_index = rdreg->free_index;
......@@ -799,16 +804,20 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
rd_dev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_rd_registers);
rd_dev->redist_vcpu = vcpu;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, rd_base,
2 * SZ_64K, &rd_dev->dev);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* Protected by slots_lock */
rdreg->free_index++;
return 0;
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
return ret;
}
static void vgic_unregister_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
......@@ -834,12 +843,10 @@ static int vgic_register_all_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm)
/* The current c failed, so iterate over the previous ones. */
int i;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
for (i = 0; i < c; i++) {
vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, i);
vgic_unregister_redist_iodev(vcpu);
}
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
}
return ret;
......@@ -938,7 +945,9 @@ int vgic_v3_set_redist_base(struct kvm *kvm, u32 index, u64 addr, u32 count)
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
ret = vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region(kvm, index, addr, count);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -950,8 +959,10 @@ int vgic_v3_set_redist_base(struct kvm *kvm, u32 index, u64 addr, u32 count)
if (ret) {
struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
rdreg = vgic_v3_rdist_region_from_index(kvm, index);
vgic_v3_free_redist_region(rdreg);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -1096,7 +1096,6 @@ int vgic_register_dist_iodev(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t dist_base_address,
enum vgic_type type)
{
struct vgic_io_device *io_device = &kvm->arch.vgic.dist_iodev;
int ret = 0;
unsigned int len;
switch (type) {
......@@ -1114,10 +1113,6 @@ int vgic_register_dist_iodev(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t dist_base_address,
io_device->iodev_type = IODEV_DIST;
io_device->redist_vcpu = NULL;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, dist_base_address,
len, &io_device->dev);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
return ret;
return kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, dist_base_address,
len, &io_device->dev);
}
......@@ -312,12 +312,6 @@ int vgic_v2_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
return ret;
}
ret = vgic_register_dist_iodev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base, VGIC_V2);
if (ret) {
kvm_err("Unable to register VGIC MMIO regions\n");
return ret;
}
if (!static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v2_cpuif_trap)) {
ret = kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(kvm, dist->vgic_cpu_base,
kvm_vgic_global_state.vcpu_base,
......
......@@ -539,7 +539,6 @@ int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
int ret = 0;
unsigned long c;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
......@@ -569,12 +568,6 @@ int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
return -EBUSY;
}
ret = vgic_register_dist_iodev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base, VGIC_V3);
if (ret) {
kvm_err("Unable to register VGICv3 dist MMIO regions\n");
return ret;
}
if (kvm_vgic_global_state.has_gicv4_1)
vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(kvm);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment