ALSA: pcm: Use __ffs() instead of ffs() in snd_mask_min()
The difference between __ffs and ffs is that ffs will return a one based index whereas __ffs will return a zero based index. Furthermore ffs will check if the passed value is zero and return zero in that case, whereas __ffs behavior is undefined if the passed parameter is 0. Since we already check if the mask is 0 before calling ffs and also subtract 1 from the result __ffs is the better choice. Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment