staging: ks7010: fix checkpatch BRACES

Checkpatch emits CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else
statement. Statements in question are single statements so we do not
need braces. Checkpatch also warns about multiple line dereference for
this code.

Fix if/else/else if statement use of braces. Fix function argument layout
at the same time since it is the same statement.
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c

@@ -2456,19 +2456,15 @@ void hostif_sme_execute(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, int event)
 		hostif_phy_information_request(priv);
 		break;
 	case SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST:
-		if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 1) {
-			hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
-						   priv->wpa.mic_failure.
-						   failure - 1, 0);
-		} else if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 2) {
-			hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
-						   priv->wpa.mic_failure.
-						   failure - 1,
-						   priv->wpa.mic_failure.
-						   counter);
-		} else
-			DPRINTK(4,
-				"SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST: failure count=%u error?\n",
+		if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 1)
+			hostif_mic_failure_request(
+				priv, priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1, 0);
+		else if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 2)
+			hostif_mic_failure_request(
+				priv, priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1,
+				priv->wpa.mic_failure.counter);
+		else
+			DPRINTK(4, "SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST: failure count=%u error?\n",
 				priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure);
 		break;
 	case SME_MIC_FAILURE_CONFIRM: