Commit 5aa50507 authored by Luca Abeni's avatar Luca Abeni Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/deadline: Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks

Commit:

  9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")

broke select_task_rq_dl() and find_lock_later_rq(), because it introduced
a comparison between the local task's deadline and dl.earliest_dl.curr of
the remote queue.

However, if the remote runqueue does not contain any SCHED_DEADLINE
task its earliest_dl.curr is 0 (always smaller than the deadline of
the local task) and the remote runqueue is not selected for pushing.

As a result, if an application creates multiple SCHED_DEADLINE
threads, they will never be pushed to runqueues that do not already
contain SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.

This patch fixes the issue by checking if dl.dl_nr_running == 0.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444982781-15608-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.itSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 0baabb38
...@@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) ...@@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
int target = find_later_rq(p); int target = find_later_rq(p);
if (target != -1 && if (target != -1 &&
dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr) ||
(cpu_rq(target)->dl.dl_nr_running == 0)))
cpu = target; cpu = target;
} }
rcu_read_unlock(); rcu_read_unlock();
...@@ -1417,7 +1418,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) ...@@ -1417,7 +1418,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
if (!dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline, if (later_rq->dl.dl_nr_running &&
!dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline,
later_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) { later_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) {
/* /*
* Target rq has tasks of equal or earlier deadline, * Target rq has tasks of equal or earlier deadline,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment