Commit 5eb02701 authored by Jiapeng Chong's avatar Jiapeng Chong Committed by Ping-Ke Shih

wifi: rtw89: Remove the redundant else branch in the function rtw89_phy_get_kpath

The assignment of the else and if branches is the same in the "case:
MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF" branch of the function rtw89_phy_get_kpath, so we
remove it and add comments here to make the code easier to understand.

./drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c:6406:2-4: WARNING: possible condition with no effect (if == else).
Reported-by: default avatarAbaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=8812Signed-off-by: default avatarJiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240422072922.50940-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
parent 416a445e
...@@ -6403,10 +6403,8 @@ enum rtw89_rf_path_bit rtw89_phy_get_kpath(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, ...@@ -6403,10 +6403,8 @@ enum rtw89_rf_path_bit rtw89_phy_get_kpath(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
return RF_D; return RF_D;
case MLO_0_PLUS_2_1RF: case MLO_0_PLUS_2_1RF:
case MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_1RF:
if (phy_idx == RTW89_PHY_0) /* for both PHY 0/1 */
return RF_AB; return RF_AB;
else
return RF_AB;
case MLO_0_PLUS_2_2RF: case MLO_0_PLUS_2_2RF:
case MLO_2_PLUS_0_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_0_2RF:
case MLO_2_PLUS_2_2RF: case MLO_2_PLUS_2_2RF:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment