Commit 61a6cb49 authored by Eric Biggers's avatar Eric Biggers Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove obsolete comment from ext4_can_extents_be_merged()

Support for unwritten extents was added to ext4 a long time ago, so
remove a misleading comment that says they're a future feature.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191231180444.46586-7-ebiggers@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRitesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
parent adde81cf
......@@ -1716,11 +1716,6 @@ static int ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode,
le32_to_cpu(ex2->ee_block))
return 0;
/*
* To allow future support for preallocated extents to be added
* as an RO_COMPAT feature, refuse to merge to extents if
* this can result in the top bit of ee_len being set.
*/
if (ext1_ee_len + ext2_ee_len > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN)
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment