arm: implement ->dma_supported instead of ->set_dma_mask

Same behavior, less code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c

@@ -445,12 +445,12 @@ static void dmabounce_sync_for_device(struct device *dev,
 	arm_dma_ops.sync_single_for_device(dev, handle, size, dir);
 }
 
-static int dmabounce_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask)
+static int dmabounce_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask)
 {
 	if (dev->archdata.dmabounce)
 		return 0;
 
-	return arm_dma_ops.set_dma_mask(dev, dma_mask);
+	return arm_dma_ops.dma_supported(dev, dma_mask);
 }
 
 static int dmabounce_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
@@ -471,9 +471,8 @@ static const struct dma_map_ops dmabounce_ops = {
 	.unmap_sg		= arm_dma_unmap_sg,
 	.sync_sg_for_cpu	= arm_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu,
 	.sync_sg_for_device	= arm_dma_sync_sg_for_device,
-	.set_dma_mask		= dmabounce_set_mask,
+	.dma_supported		= dmabounce_dma_supported,
 	.mapping_error		= dmabounce_mapping_error,
-	.dma_supported		= arm_dma_supported,
 };
 
 static int dmabounce_init_pool(struct dmabounce_pool *pool, struct device *dev,