Commit 645d72aa authored by Kent Overstreet's avatar Kent Overstreet Committed by Kent Overstreet

bcachefs: Fix btree updates when mixing cached and non cached iterators

There was a bug where bch2_trans_update() would incorrectly delete a
pending update where the new update did not actually overwrite the
existing update, because we were incorrectly using BTREE_ITER_TYPE when
sorting pending btree updates.

This affects the pending patch to use cached iterators for inode
updates.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
parent eb460979
......@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ struct btree *bch2_btree_node_get_sibling(struct bch_fs *c,
* holding other locks that would cause us to deadlock:
*/
trans_for_each_iter(trans, linked)
if (btree_iter_cmp(iter, linked) < 0)
if (btree_iter_lock_cmp(iter, linked) < 0)
__bch2_btree_iter_unlock(linked);
if (sib == btree_prev_sib)
......
......@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static int __btree_iter_traverse_all(struct btree_trans *trans, int ret)
sorted[nr_sorted++] = iter->idx;
#define btree_iter_cmp_by_idx(_l, _r) \
btree_iter_cmp(&trans->iters[_l], &trans->iters[_r])
btree_iter_lock_cmp(&trans->iters[_l], &trans->iters[_r])
bubble_sort(sorted, nr_sorted, btree_iter_cmp_by_idx);
#undef btree_iter_cmp_by_idx
......
......@@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ void bch2_btree_iter_set_pos_same_leaf(struct btree_iter *, struct bpos);
void __bch2_btree_iter_set_pos(struct btree_iter *, struct bpos, bool);
void bch2_btree_iter_set_pos(struct btree_iter *, struct bpos);
static inline int btree_iter_cmp(const struct btree_iter *l,
/* Sort order for locking btree iterators: */
static inline int btree_iter_lock_cmp(const struct btree_iter *l,
const struct btree_iter *r)
{
return cmp_int(l->btree_id, r->btree_id) ?:
......
......@@ -690,6 +690,13 @@ bch2_trans_commit_get_rw_cold(struct btree_trans *trans)
return 0;
}
static inline int btree_iter_pos_cmp(const struct btree_iter *l,
const struct btree_iter *r)
{
return cmp_int(l->btree_id, r->btree_id) ?:
bkey_cmp(l->pos, r->pos);
}
static void bch2_trans_update2(struct btree_trans *trans,
struct btree_iter *iter,
struct bkey_i *insert)
......@@ -707,12 +714,12 @@ static void bch2_trans_update2(struct btree_trans *trans,
iter->flags |= BTREE_ITER_KEEP_UNTIL_COMMIT;
trans_for_each_update2(trans, i) {
if (btree_iter_cmp(n.iter, i->iter) == 0) {
if (btree_iter_pos_cmp(n.iter, i->iter) == 0) {
*i = n;
return;
}
if (btree_iter_cmp(n.iter, i->iter) <= 0)
if (btree_iter_pos_cmp(n.iter, i->iter) <= 0)
break;
}
......@@ -996,7 +1003,7 @@ int bch2_trans_update(struct btree_trans *trans, struct btree_iter *iter,
* Pending updates are kept sorted: first, find position of new update:
*/
trans_for_each_update(trans, i)
if (btree_iter_cmp(iter, i->iter) <= 0)
if (btree_iter_pos_cmp(iter, i->iter) <= 0)
break;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment