Commit 66f314ef authored by Rik van Riel's avatar Rik van Riel Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/fpu: Remove __fpregs_(de)activate()

Now that fpregs_activate() and fpregs_deactivate() do nothing except
call the double underscored versions of themselves, we can get
rid of the double underscore version.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1475627678-20788-9-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 25d83b53
...@@ -509,8 +509,11 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu) ...@@ -509,8 +509,11 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu)
return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu;
} }
/*
static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) * These generally need preemption protection to work,
* do try to avoid using these on their own:
*/
static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
{ {
WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active); WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active);
...@@ -519,7 +522,7 @@ static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) ...@@ -519,7 +522,7 @@ static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu); trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu);
} }
static inline void __fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu) static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
{ {
WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active); WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active);
...@@ -543,20 +546,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_active(void) ...@@ -543,20 +546,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_active(void)
return current->thread.fpu.fpregs_active; return current->thread.fpu.fpregs_active;
} }
/*
* These generally need preemption protection to work,
* do try to avoid using these on their own.
*/
static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
{
__fpregs_activate(fpu);
}
static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
{
__fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
}
/* /*
* FPU state switching for scheduling. * FPU state switching for scheduling.
* *
...@@ -595,7 +584,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu, int cpu) ...@@ -595,7 +584,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu, int cpu)
/* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */ /* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */
if (fpu.preload) { if (fpu.preload) {
__fpregs_activate(new_fpu); fpregs_activate(new_fpu);
trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu); trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu);
prefetch(&new_fpu->state); prefetch(&new_fpu->state);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment