Commit 69e63001 authored by Liu Ying's avatar Liu Ying Committed by Alex Deucher

drm/atomic: Check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable in self refresh mode

Actual hardware state of CRTC is controlled by the member 'active' in
struct drm_crtc_state instead of the member 'enable', according to the
kernel doc of the member 'enable'.  In fact, the drm client modeset
and atomic helpers are using the member 'active' to do the control.

Referencing the member 'enable' of new_crtc_state, the function
crtc_needs_disable() may fail to reflect if CRTC needs disable in
self refresh mode, e.g., when the framebuffer emulation will be blanked
through the client modeset helper with the next commit, the member
'enable' of new_crtc_state is still true while the member 'active' is
false, hence the relevant potential encoder and bridges won't be disabled.

So, let's check new_crtc_state->active to determine if CRTC needs disable
in self refresh mode instead of new_crtc_state->enable.

Fixes: 1452c25b ("drm: Add helpers to kick off self refresh mode in drivers")
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211230040626.646807-1-victor.liu@nxp.com
parent 5da8b49d
...@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ crtc_needs_disable(struct drm_crtc_state *old_state, ...@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ crtc_needs_disable(struct drm_crtc_state *old_state,
* it's in self refresh mode and needs to be fully disabled. * it's in self refresh mode and needs to be fully disabled.
*/ */
return old_state->active || return old_state->active ||
(old_state->self_refresh_active && !new_state->enable) || (old_state->self_refresh_active && !new_state->active) ||
new_state->self_refresh_active; new_state->self_refresh_active;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment