ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_components() position

It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

soc_probe_link_components() has paired soc_remove_link_components(),
but, these are implemented at different place.
So it is difficult to confirm code.
This patch moves soc_probe_link_components() next to
soc_remove_link_components().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o90g7lbd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

sound/soc/soc-core.c

@@ -1135,6 +1135,26 @@ static void soc_remove_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
 	}
 }
 
+static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
+				     struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int order)
+{
+	struct snd_soc_component *component;
+	struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list *rtdcom;
+	int ret;
+
+	for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
+		component = rtdcom->component;
+
+		if (component->driver->probe_order == order) {
+			ret = soc_probe_component(card, component);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void soc_remove_dai_links(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 {
 	int order;
@@ -1379,26 +1399,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
-				     struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int order)
-{
-	struct snd_soc_component *component;
-	struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list *rtdcom;
-	int ret;
-
-	for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
-		component = rtdcom->component;
-
-		if (component->driver->probe_order == order) {
-			ret = soc_probe_component(card, component);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order)
 {
 	int ret;