bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev
The bonding driver lacks the rcu lock when it calls down into netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu from bond_poll_controller, which results in a trace like: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 179 at net/core/dev.c:6567 netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu+0x34/0x40 CPU: 2 PID: 179 Comm: kworker/u16:15 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc5-backup+ #1 Workqueue: bond0 bond_mii_monitor RIP: 0010:netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu+0x34/0x40 Code: 48 89 fb e8 fe 29 63 ff 85 c0 74 1e 48 8b 45 00 48 81 c3 c0 00 00 00 48 8b 00 48 39 d8 74 0f 48 89 45 00 48 8b 40 f8 5b 5d c3 <0f> 0b eb de 31 c0 eb f5 0f 1f 40 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000087fa68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880429614560 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffffffffa184ada0 RBP: ffffc9000087fa80 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffc9000087f9f0 R11: ffff880429798040 R12: ffff8804289d5980 R13: ffffffffa1511f60 R14: 00000000000000c8 R15: 00000000ffffffff FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f4b78fce180 CR3: 000000018180f006 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Call Trace: bond_poll_controller+0x52/0x170 netpoll_poll_dev+0x79/0x290 netpoll_send_skb_on_dev+0x158/0x2c0 netpoll_send_udp+0x2d5/0x430 write_ext_msg+0x1e0/0x210 console_unlock+0x3c4/0x630 vprintk_emit+0xfa/0x2f0 printk+0x52/0x6e ? __netdev_printk+0x12b/0x220 netdev_info+0x64/0x80 ? bond_3ad_set_carrier+0xe9/0x180 bond_select_active_slave+0x1fc/0x310 bond_mii_monitor+0x709/0x9b0 process_one_work+0x221/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x4f/0x3b0 kthread+0x100/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 ? kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 We're also doing rcu dereferences a layer up in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev before we call down into netpoll_poll_dev, so just take the lock there. Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment