Commit 701f4906 authored by Mark Rutland's avatar Mark Rutland Committed by Catalin Marinas

arm64: mark __system_matches_cap as __maybe_unused

Now that the PAN toggling has been removed, the only user of
__system_matches_cap() is has_generic_auth(), which is only built when
CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH is selected, and Qian reports that this results in
a build-time warning when CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH is not selected:

| arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:2649:13: warning: '__system_matches_cap' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
|  static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n)
|              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It's tricky to restructure things to prevent this, so let's mark
__system_matches_cap() as __maybe_unused, as we used to do for the other
user of __system_matches_cap() which we just removed.
Reported-by: default avatarQian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarQian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203152403.26100-1-mark.rutland@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
parent 1517c4fa
...@@ -2634,7 +2634,7 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n) ...@@ -2634,7 +2634,7 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n)
* - The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set. * - The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set.
* In all other cases cpus_have_{const_}cap() should be used. * In all other cases cpus_have_{const_}cap() should be used.
*/ */
static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n) static bool __maybe_unused __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n)
{ {
if (n < ARM64_NCAPS) { if (n < ARM64_NCAPS) {
const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap = cpu_hwcaps_ptrs[n]; const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap = cpu_hwcaps_ptrs[n];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment