Commit 71102bc7 authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede

platform/x86: int3472: Add get_sensor_adev_and_name() helper

The discrete.c code is not the only code which needs to lookup the
acpi_device and device-name for the sensor for which the INT3472
ACPI-device is a GPIO/clk/regulator provider.

The tps68470.c code also needs this functionality, so factor this
out into a new get_sensor_adev_and_name() helper.
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211203102857.44539-9-hdegoede@redhat.com
parent a2f9fbc2
...@@ -52,3 +52,31 @@ int skl_int3472_fill_cldb(struct acpi_device *adev, struct int3472_cldb *cldb) ...@@ -52,3 +52,31 @@ int skl_int3472_fill_cldb(struct acpi_device *adev, struct int3472_cldb *cldb)
kfree(obj); kfree(obj);
return ret; return ret;
} }
/* sensor_adev_ret may be NULL, name_ret must not be NULL */
int skl_int3472_get_sensor_adev_and_name(struct device *dev,
struct acpi_device **sensor_adev_ret,
const char **name_ret)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
struct acpi_device *sensor;
int ret = 0;
sensor = acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev(adev);
if (!sensor) {
dev_err(dev, "INT3472 seems to have no dependents.\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
*name_ret = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT,
acpi_dev_name(sensor));
if (!*name_ret)
ret = -ENOMEM;
if (ret == 0 && sensor_adev_ret)
*sensor_adev_ret = sensor;
else
acpi_dev_put(sensor);
return ret;
}
...@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ struct int3472_discrete_device { ...@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ struct int3472_discrete_device {
union acpi_object *skl_int3472_get_acpi_buffer(struct acpi_device *adev, union acpi_object *skl_int3472_get_acpi_buffer(struct acpi_device *adev,
char *id); char *id);
int skl_int3472_fill_cldb(struct acpi_device *adev, struct int3472_cldb *cldb); int skl_int3472_fill_cldb(struct acpi_device *adev, struct int3472_cldb *cldb);
int skl_int3472_get_sensor_adev_and_name(struct device *dev,
struct acpi_device **sensor_adev_ret,
const char **name_ret);
int skl_int3472_register_clock(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472); int skl_int3472_register_clock(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472);
void skl_int3472_unregister_clock(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472); void skl_int3472_unregister_clock(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472);
......
...@@ -363,19 +363,10 @@ static int skl_int3472_discrete_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ...@@ -363,19 +363,10 @@ static int skl_int3472_discrete_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int3472->dev = &pdev->dev; int3472->dev = &pdev->dev;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, int3472); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, int3472);
int3472->sensor = acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev(adev); ret = skl_int3472_get_sensor_adev_and_name(&pdev->dev, &int3472->sensor,
if (!int3472->sensor) { &int3472->sensor_name);
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "INT3472 seems to have no dependents.\n"); if (ret)
return -ENODEV; return ret;
}
int3472->sensor_name = devm_kasprintf(int3472->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT,
acpi_dev_name(int3472->sensor));
if (!int3472->sensor_name) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_put_sensor;
}
/* /*
* Initialising this list means we can call gpiod_remove_lookup_table() * Initialising this list means we can call gpiod_remove_lookup_table()
...@@ -390,11 +381,6 @@ static int skl_int3472_discrete_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ...@@ -390,11 +381,6 @@ static int skl_int3472_discrete_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
} }
return 0; return 0;
err_put_sensor:
acpi_dev_put(int3472->sensor);
return ret;
} }
static int skl_int3472_discrete_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) static int skl_int3472_discrete_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment