Commit 74dc3384 authored by Aleksa Sarai's avatar Aleksa Sarai Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/debug: Use task_pid_nr_ns in /proc/$pid/sched

It appears as though the addition of the PID namespace did not update
the output code for /proc/*/sched, which resulted in it providing PIDs
that were not self-consistent with the /proc mount. This additionally
made it trivial to detect whether a process was inside &init_pid_ns from
userspace, making container detection trivial:

   https://github.com/jessfraz/amicontained

This leads to situations such as:

  % unshare -pmf
  % mount -t proc proc /proc
  % head -n1 /proc/1/sched
  head (10047, #threads: 1)

Fix this by just using task_pid_nr_ns for the output of /proc/*/sched.
All of the other uses of task_pid_nr in kernel/sched/debug.c are from a
sysctl context and thus don't need to be namespaced.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: cyphar@cyphar.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170806044141.5093-1-asarai@suse.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 18f08dae
...@@ -1408,12 +1408,13 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_fail_nth_operations = { ...@@ -1408,12 +1408,13 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_fail_nth_operations = {
static int sched_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) static int sched_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{ {
struct inode *inode = m->private; struct inode *inode = m->private;
struct pid_namespace *ns = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
struct task_struct *p; struct task_struct *p;
p = get_proc_task(inode); p = get_proc_task(inode);
if (!p) if (!p)
return -ESRCH; return -ESRCH;
proc_sched_show_task(p, m); proc_sched_show_task(p, ns, m);
put_task_struct(p); put_task_struct(p);
......
...@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ ...@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
*/ */
struct task_struct; struct task_struct;
struct pid_namespace;
extern void dump_cpu_task(int cpu); extern void dump_cpu_task(int cpu);
...@@ -34,7 +35,8 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p); ...@@ -34,7 +35,8 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
struct seq_file; struct seq_file;
extern void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m); extern void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p,
struct pid_namespace *ns, struct seq_file *m);
extern void proc_sched_set_task(struct task_struct *p); extern void proc_sched_set_task(struct task_struct *p);
#endif #endif
......
...@@ -872,11 +872,12 @@ static void sched_show_numa(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m) ...@@ -872,11 +872,12 @@ static void sched_show_numa(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
#endif #endif
} }
void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m) void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns,
struct seq_file *m)
{ {
unsigned long nr_switches; unsigned long nr_switches;
SEQ_printf(m, "%s (%d, #threads: %d)\n", p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), SEQ_printf(m, "%s (%d, #threads: %d)\n", p->comm, task_pid_nr_ns(p, ns),
get_nr_threads(p)); get_nr_threads(p));
SEQ_printf(m, SEQ_printf(m,
"---------------------------------------------------------" "---------------------------------------------------------"
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment