Commit 74fb5e25 authored by Heiner Kallweit's avatar Heiner Kallweit Committed by David S. Miller

net: phy: improve handling of PHY_RUNNING in state machine

Handling of state PHY_RUNNING seems to be more complex than it needs
to be. If not polling, then we don't have to do anything, we'll
receive an interrupt and go to state PHY_CHANGELINK once the link
goes down. If polling and link is down, we don't have to go the
extra mile over PHY_CHANGELINK and call phy_read_status() again
but can set status PHY_NOLINK directly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 0813e957
...@@ -941,7 +941,6 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work) ...@@ -941,7 +941,6 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
bool needs_aneg = false, do_suspend = false; bool needs_aneg = false, do_suspend = false;
enum phy_state old_state; enum phy_state old_state;
int err = 0; int err = 0;
int old_link;
mutex_lock(&phydev->lock); mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
...@@ -1025,26 +1024,16 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work) ...@@ -1025,26 +1024,16 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
} }
break; break;
case PHY_RUNNING: case PHY_RUNNING:
/* Only register a CHANGE if we are polling and link changed if (!phy_polling_mode(phydev))
* since latest checking. break;
*/
if (phy_polling_mode(phydev)) {
old_link = phydev->link;
err = phy_read_status(phydev); err = phy_read_status(phydev);
if (err) if (err)
break; break;
if (old_link != phydev->link) if (!phydev->link) {
phydev->state = PHY_CHANGELINK; phydev->state = PHY_NOLINK;
} phy_link_down(phydev, true);
/*
* Failsafe: check that nobody set phydev->link=0 between two
* poll cycles, otherwise we won't leave RUNNING state as long
* as link remains down.
*/
if (!phydev->link && phydev->state == PHY_RUNNING) {
phydev->state = PHY_CHANGELINK;
phydev_err(phydev, "no link in PHY_RUNNING\n");
} }
break; break;
case PHY_CHANGELINK: case PHY_CHANGELINK:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment