Commit 7759eb23 authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Jens Axboe

block: remove bio_rewind_iter()

It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:

1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding

2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b (block: reset
bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)

3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting

4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path

[1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2

So this patch takes Kent's suggestion to restore one bio into its original
state via saving bio iterator(struct bvec_iter) in bio_integrity_prep(),
given now bio_rewind_iter() is only used by bio integrity code.

Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 3d0e6375
......@@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ bool bio_integrity_prep(struct bio *bio)
if (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) {
bio_integrity_process(bio, &bio->bi_iter,
bi->profile->generate_fn);
} else {
bip->bio_iter = bio->bi_iter;
}
return true;
......@@ -331,20 +333,14 @@ static void bio_integrity_verify_fn(struct work_struct *work)
container_of(work, struct bio_integrity_payload, bip_work);
struct bio *bio = bip->bip_bio;
struct blk_integrity *bi = blk_get_integrity(bio->bi_disk);
struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
/*
* At the moment verify is called bio's iterator was advanced
* during split and completion, we need to rewind iterator to
* it's original position.
*/
if (bio_rewind_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_done)) {
bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &iter,
bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &bip->bio_iter,
bi->profile->verify_fn);
} else {
bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
}
bio_integrity_free(bio);
bio_endio(bio);
}
......
......@@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ struct bio *bio_split(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
bio_integrity_trim(split);
bio_advance(bio, split->bi_iter.bi_size);
bio->bi_iter.bi_done = 0;
if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_TRACE_COMPLETION))
bio_set_flag(split, BIO_TRACE_COMPLETION);
......
......@@ -170,27 +170,11 @@ static inline void bio_advance_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
{
iter->bi_sector += bytes >> 9;
if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio))
iter->bi_size -= bytes;
iter->bi_done += bytes;
} else {
else
bvec_iter_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
/* TODO: It is reasonable to complete bio with error here. */
}
}
static inline bool bio_rewind_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
unsigned int bytes)
{
iter->bi_sector -= bytes >> 9;
if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
iter->bi_size += bytes;
iter->bi_done -= bytes;
return true;
}
return bvec_iter_rewind(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
}
#define __bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, start) \
......@@ -353,6 +337,8 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload {
unsigned short bip_max_vcnt; /* integrity bio_vec slots */
unsigned short bip_flags; /* control flags */
struct bvec_iter bio_iter; /* for rewinding parent bio */
struct work_struct bip_work; /* I/O completion */
struct bio_vec *bip_vec;
......
......@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ struct bvec_iter {
unsigned int bi_idx; /* current index into bvl_vec */
unsigned int bi_done; /* number of bytes completed */
unsigned int bi_bvec_done; /* number of bytes completed in
current bvec */
};
......@@ -85,7 +83,6 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
bytes -= len;
iter->bi_size -= len;
iter->bi_bvec_done += len;
iter->bi_done += len;
if (iter->bi_bvec_done == __bvec_iter_bvec(bv, *iter)->bv_len) {
iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment