perf sort: Fix the 'weight' sort key behavior
Currently, the 'weight' field in the perf sample has latency information for some instructions like in memory accesses. And perf tool has 'weight' and 'local_weight' sort keys to display the info. But it's somewhat confusing what it shows exactly. In my understanding, 'local_weight' shows a weight in a single sample, and (global) 'weight' shows a sum of the weights in the hist_entry. For example: $ perf mem record -t load dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1M $ perf report --stdio -n -s +local_weight ... # # Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol Local Weight # ........ ....... ....... ................ ......................... ............ # 21.23% 313 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_get_not_zero 32 12.43% 183 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_get_not_zero 35 11.97% 159 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_get_not_zero 36 10.40% 141 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_put_return 32 7.63% 113 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_get_not_zero 33 6.37% 92 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_get_not_zero 34 6.15% 90 dd [kernel.vmlinux] [k] lockref_put_return 33 ... So let's look at the 'lockref_get_not_zero' symbols. The top entry shows that 313 samples were captured with 'local_weight' 32, so the total weight should be 313 x 32 = 10016. But it's not the case: $ perf report --stdio -n -s +local_weight,weight -S lockref_get_not_zero ... # # Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Local Weight Weight # ........ ....... ....... ................ ............ ...... # 1.36% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 36 144 0.47% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 37 148 0.42% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 32 128 0.40% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 34 136 0.35% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 36 144 0.34% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 35 140 0.30% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 36 144 0.30% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 34 136 0.30% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 32 128 0.30% 4 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 32 128 ... With the 'weight' sort key, it's divided to 4 samples even with the same info ('comm', 'dso', 'sym' and 'local_weight'). I don't think this is what we want. I found this because of the way it aggregates the 'weight' value. Since it's not a period, we should not add them in the he->stat. Otherwise, two 32 'weight' entries will create a 64 'weight' entry. After that, new 32 'weight' samples don't have a matching entry so it'd create a new entry and make it a 64 'weight' entry again and again. Later, they will be merged into 128 'weight' entries during the hists__collapse_resort() with 4 samples, multiple times like above. Let's keep the weight and display it differently. For 'local_weight', it can show the weight as is, and for (global) 'weight' it can display the number multiplied by the number of samples. With this change, I can see the expected numbers. $ perf report --stdio -n -s +local_weight,weight -S lockref_get_not_zero ... # # Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Local Weight Weight # ........ ....... ....... ................ ............ ..... # 21.23% 313 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 32 10016 12.43% 183 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 35 6405 11.97% 159 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 36 5724 7.63% 113 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 33 3729 6.37% 92 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 34 3128 4.17% 59 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 37 2183 0.08% 1 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 269 269 0.08% 1 dd [kernel.vmlinux] 38 38 Reviewed-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Tested-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211105225617.151364-1-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment