Commit 78c9c4df authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling

The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding functions
can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int. As a
consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
random number generators.

The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.

Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to user space
via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a positive value
between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
overrun value has been clamped.
Reported-by: default avatarTeam OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
parent 6fec64e1
......@@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ struct k_itimer {
clockid_t it_clock;
timer_t it_id;
int it_active;
int it_overrun;
int it_overrun_last;
s64 it_overrun;
s64 it_overrun_last;
int it_requeue_pending;
int it_sigev_notify;
ktime_t it_interval;
......
......@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void bump_cpu_timer(struct k_itimer *timer, u64 now)
continue;
timer->it.cpu.expires += incr;
timer->it_overrun += 1 << i;
timer->it_overrun += 1LL << i;
delta -= incr;
}
}
......
......@@ -283,6 +283,17 @@ static __init int init_posix_timers(void)
}
__initcall(init_posix_timers);
/*
* The siginfo si_overrun field and the return value of timer_getoverrun(2)
* are of type int. Clamp the overrun value to INT_MAX
*/
static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr, int baseval)
{
s64 sum = timr->it_overrun_last + (s64)baseval;
return sum > (s64)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)sum;
}
static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timr)
{
struct hrtimer *timer = &timr->it.real.timer;
......@@ -290,8 +301,7 @@ static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timr)
if (!timr->it_interval)
return;
timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int) hrtimer_forward(timer,
timer->base->get_time(),
timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, timer->base->get_time(),
timr->it_interval);
hrtimer_restart(timer);
}
......@@ -321,10 +331,10 @@ void posixtimer_rearm(struct siginfo *info)
timr->it_active = 1;
timr->it_overrun_last = timr->it_overrun;
timr->it_overrun = -1;
timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
++timr->it_requeue_pending;
info->si_overrun += timr->it_overrun_last;
info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, info->si_overrun);
}
unlock_timer(timr, flags);
......@@ -418,8 +428,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart posix_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
now = ktime_add(now, kj);
}
#endif
timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int)
hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
timr->it_interval);
ret = HRTIMER_RESTART;
++timr->it_requeue_pending;
......@@ -524,7 +533,7 @@ static int do_timer_create(clockid_t which_clock, struct sigevent *event,
new_timer->it_id = (timer_t) new_timer_id;
new_timer->it_clock = which_clock;
new_timer->kclock = kc;
new_timer->it_overrun = -1;
new_timer->it_overrun = -1LL;
if (event) {
rcu_read_lock();
......@@ -702,7 +711,7 @@ void common_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timr, struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting)
* expiry time forward by intervals, so expiry is > now.
*/
if (iv && (timr->it_requeue_pending & REQUEUE_PENDING || sig_none))
timr->it_overrun += (int)kc->timer_forward(timr, now);
timr->it_overrun += kc->timer_forward(timr, now);
remaining = kc->timer_remaining(timr, now);
/* Return 0 only, when the timer is expired and not pending */
......@@ -791,7 +800,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_getoverrun, timer_t, timer_id)
if (!timr)
return -EINVAL;
overrun = timr->it_overrun_last;
overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, 0);
unlock_timer(timr, flags);
return overrun;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment