Commit 7955323b authored by Zhao Lei's avatar Zhao Lei Committed by Chris Mason

btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment

Because btrfs support scrub raid56 parity stripe now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
parent 3a9508b0
...@@ -3280,13 +3280,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, ...@@ -3280,13 +3280,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
scrub_blocked_if_needed(fs_info); scrub_blocked_if_needed(fs_info);
} }
/* for raid56, we skip parity stripe */
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) { if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num, map, ret = get_raid56_logic_offset(physical, num, map,
&logical, &logical,
&stripe_logical); &stripe_logical);
logical += base; logical += base;
if (ret) { if (ret) {
/* it is parity strip */
stripe_logical += base; stripe_logical += base;
stripe_end = stripe_logical + increment; stripe_end = stripe_logical + increment;
ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx, map, scrub_dev, ret = scrub_raid56_parity(sctx, map, scrub_dev,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment