Commit 79dca184 authored by Hao Xu's avatar Hao Xu Committed by Jens Axboe

io-wq: move nr_running and worker_refs out of wqe->lock protection

We don't need to protect nr_running and worker_refs by wqe->lock, so
narrow the range of raw_spin_lock_irq - raw_spin_unlock_irq
Signed-off-by: default avatarHao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810125554.99229-1-haoxu@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent ec3c3d0f
......@@ -256,16 +256,17 @@ static void io_wqe_wake_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
if (!acct->nr_workers)
first = true;
acct->nr_workers++;
do_create = true;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (do_create)
if (do_create) {
atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index, first);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment