Commit 7c8cbaca authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

Merge branch 'arm-bpf-fixes'

Nicolas Schichan says:

====================
BPF JIT fixes for ARM

These patches are fixing bugs in the ARM JIT and should probably find
their way to a stable kernel. All 60 test_bpf tests in Linux 4.1 release
are now passing OK (was 54 out of 60 before).
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parents 89e478a2 c18fe54b
......@@ -74,31 +74,51 @@ struct jit_ctx {
int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly;
static u64 jit_get_skb_b(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned offset)
static inline int call_neg_helper(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, void *ret,
unsigned int size)
{
void *ptr = bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper(skb, offset, size);
if (!ptr)
return -EFAULT;
memcpy(ret, ptr, size);
return 0;
}
static u64 jit_get_skb_b(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
{
u8 ret;
int err;
if (offset < 0)
err = call_neg_helper(skb, offset, &ret, 1);
else
err = skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, &ret, 1);
return (u64)err << 32 | ret;
}
static u64 jit_get_skb_h(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned offset)
static u64 jit_get_skb_h(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
{
u16 ret;
int err;
if (offset < 0)
err = call_neg_helper(skb, offset, &ret, 2);
else
err = skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, &ret, 2);
return (u64)err << 32 | ntohs(ret);
}
static u64 jit_get_skb_w(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned offset)
static u64 jit_get_skb_w(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
{
u32 ret;
int err;
if (offset < 0)
err = call_neg_helper(skb, offset, &ret, 4);
else
err = skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, &ret, 4);
return (u64)err << 32 | ntohl(ret);
......@@ -536,9 +556,6 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
case BPF_LD | BPF_B | BPF_ABS:
load_order = 0;
load:
/* the interpreter will deal with the negative K */
if ((int)k < 0)
return -ENOTSUPP;
emit_mov_i(r_off, k, ctx);
load_common:
ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATA | SEEN_CALL;
......@@ -547,12 +564,24 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(ARM_SUB_I(r_scratch, r_skb_hl,
1 << load_order), ctx);
emit(ARM_CMP_R(r_scratch, r_off), ctx);
condt = ARM_COND_HS;
condt = ARM_COND_GE;
} else {
emit(ARM_CMP_R(r_skb_hl, r_off), ctx);
condt = ARM_COND_HI;
}
/*
* test for negative offset, only if we are
* currently scheduled to take the fast
* path. this will update the flags so that
* the slowpath instruction are ignored if the
* offset is negative.
*
* for loard_order == 0 the HI condition will
* make loads at offset 0 take the slow path too.
*/
_emit(condt, ARM_CMP_I(r_off, 0), ctx);
_emit(condt, ARM_ADD_R(r_scratch, r_off, r_skb_data),
ctx);
......@@ -860,9 +889,11 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
off = offsetof(struct sk_buff, vlan_tci);
emit(ARM_LDRH_I(r_A, r_skb, off), ctx);
if (code == (BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG))
OP_IMM3(ARM_AND, r_A, r_A, VLAN_VID_MASK, ctx);
else
OP_IMM3(ARM_AND, r_A, r_A, VLAN_TAG_PRESENT, ctx);
OP_IMM3(ARM_AND, r_A, r_A, ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT, ctx);
else {
OP_IMM3(ARM_LSR, r_A, r_A, 12, ctx);
OP_IMM3(ARM_AND, r_A, r_A, 0x1, ctx);
}
break;
case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_QUEUE:
ctx->seen |= SEEN_SKB;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment