Commit 7cdffeb5 authored by Javier Martinez Canillas's avatar Javier Martinez Canillas Committed by Alexandre Belloni

rtc: max77686: Fix max77686_rtc_read_alarm() return value

The function is always returning zero even in case of failures since
the ret value was not propagated to the callers. Fix the error path.
Reported-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
parent 92e963f5
...@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) ...@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
out: out:
mutex_unlock(&info->lock); mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
return 0; return ret;
} }
static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info) static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment