bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents
There isn't really anything other than just "BPF" at this point, so referring to it as "eBPF" in our standards document just causes unnecessary confusion. Let's just be consistent and use "BPF". Suggested-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230828155948.123405-4-void@manifault.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment