Commit 7d743e4c authored by Eduard Zingerman's avatar Eduard Zingerman Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

selftests/bpf: __jited test tag to check disassembly after jit

Allow to verify jit behaviour by writing tests as below:

    SEC("tp")
    __arch_x86_64
    __jited("   endbr64")
    __jited("   nopl    (%rax,%rax)")
    __jited("   xorq    %rax, %rax")
    ...
    __naked void some_test(void)
    {
        asm volatile (... ::: __clobber_all);
    }

Allow regular expressions in patterns, same way as in __msg.
By default assume that each __jited pattern has to be matched on the
next consecutive line of the disassembly, e.g.:

    __jited("   endbr64")             # matched on line N
    __jited("   nopl    (%rax,%rax)") # matched on line N+1

If match occurs on a wrong line an error is reported.
To override this behaviour use __jited("..."), e.g.:

    __jited("   endbr64")             # matched on line N
    __jited("...")                    # not matched
    __jited("   nopl    (%rax,%rax)") # matched on any line >= N
Signed-off-by: default avatarEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-7-eddyz87@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent b991fc52
......@@ -36,6 +36,39 @@
* Regular expressions could be specified same way as in __msg.
* __xlated_unpriv Same as __xlated but for unprivileged mode.
*
* __jited Match a line in a disassembly of the jited BPF program.
* Has to be used after __arch_* macro.
* For example:
*
* __arch_x86_64
* __jited(" endbr64")
* __jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)")
* __jited(" xorq %rax, %rax")
* ...
* __naked void some_test(void)
* {
* asm volatile (... ::: __clobber_all);
* }
*
* Regular expressions could be included in patterns same way
* as in __msg.
*
* By default assume that each pattern has to be matched on the
* next consecutive line of disassembly, e.g.:
*
* __jited(" endbr64") # matched on line N
* __jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)") # matched on line N+1
*
* If match occurs on a wrong line an error is reported.
* To override this behaviour use literal "...", e.g.:
*
* __jited(" endbr64") # matched on line N
* __jited("...") # not matched
* __jited(" nopl (%rax,%rax)") # matched on any line >= N
*
* __jited_unpriv Same as __jited but for unprivileged mode.
*
*
* __success Expect program load success in privileged mode.
* __success_unpriv Expect program load success in unprivileged mode.
*
......@@ -76,11 +109,13 @@
*/
#define __msg(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __xlated(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_xlated=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __jited(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_jited=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __failure __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure")))
#define __success __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success")))
#define __description(desc) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_description=" desc)))
#define __msg_unpriv(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __xlated_unpriv(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_xlated_unpriv=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __jited_unpriv(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_jited=" XSTR(__COUNTER__) "=" msg)))
#define __failure_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv")))
#define __success_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success_unpriv")))
#define __log_level(lvl) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_log_level="#lvl)))
......
......@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "disasm_helpers.h"
#include "unpriv_helpers.h"
#include "cap_helpers.h"
#include "jit_disasm_helpers.h"
#define str_has_pfx(str, pfx) \
(strncmp(str, pfx, __builtin_constant_p(pfx) ? sizeof(pfx) - 1 : strlen(pfx)) == 0)
......@@ -33,6 +34,8 @@
#define TEST_TAG_AUXILIARY_UNPRIV "comment:test_auxiliary_unpriv"
#define TEST_BTF_PATH "comment:test_btf_path="
#define TEST_TAG_ARCH "comment:test_arch="
#define TEST_TAG_JITED_PFX "comment:test_jited="
#define TEST_TAG_JITED_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_jited_unpriv="
/* Warning: duplicated in bpf_misc.h */
#define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all
......@@ -68,6 +71,7 @@ struct test_subspec {
bool expect_failure;
struct expected_msgs expect_msgs;
struct expected_msgs expect_xlated;
struct expected_msgs jited;
int retval;
bool execute;
};
......@@ -124,6 +128,8 @@ static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec)
free_msgs(&spec->unpriv.expect_msgs);
free_msgs(&spec->priv.expect_xlated);
free_msgs(&spec->unpriv.expect_xlated);
free_msgs(&spec->priv.jited);
free_msgs(&spec->unpriv.jited);
free(spec->priv.name);
free(spec->unpriv.name);
......@@ -237,6 +243,21 @@ static int push_msg(const char *substr, struct expected_msgs *msgs)
return __push_msg(substr, false, msgs);
}
static int push_disasm_msg(const char *regex_str, bool *on_next_line, struct expected_msgs *msgs)
{
int err;
if (strcmp(regex_str, "...") == 0) {
*on_next_line = false;
return 0;
}
err = __push_msg(regex_str, *on_next_line, msgs);
if (err)
return err;
*on_next_line = true;
return 0;
}
static int parse_int(const char *str, int *val, const char *name)
{
char *end;
......@@ -320,6 +341,18 @@ enum arch {
ARCH_RISCV64 = 0x4,
};
static int get_current_arch(void)
{
#if defined(__x86_64__)
return ARCH_X86_64;
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
return ARCH_ARM64;
#elif defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64
return ARCH_RISCV64;
#endif
return 0;
}
/* Uses btf_decl_tag attributes to describe the expected test
* behavior, see bpf_misc.h for detailed description of each attribute
* and attribute combinations.
......@@ -332,9 +365,13 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
const char *description = NULL;
bool has_unpriv_result = false;
bool has_unpriv_retval = false;
bool unpriv_jit_on_next_line;
bool jit_on_next_line;
bool collect_jit = false;
int func_id, i, err = 0;
u32 arch_mask = 0;
struct btf *btf;
enum arch arch;
memset(spec, 0, sizeof(*spec));
......@@ -399,6 +436,30 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
if (err)
goto cleanup;
spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
} else if ((msg = skip_dynamic_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_JITED_PFX))) {
if (arch_mask == 0) {
PRINT_FAIL("__jited used before __arch_*");
goto cleanup;
}
if (collect_jit) {
err = push_disasm_msg(msg, &jit_on_next_line,
&spec->priv.jited);
if (err)
goto cleanup;
spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
}
} else if ((msg = skip_dynamic_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_JITED_PFX_UNPRIV))) {
if (arch_mask == 0) {
PRINT_FAIL("__unpriv_jited used before __arch_*");
goto cleanup;
}
if (collect_jit) {
err = push_disasm_msg(msg, &unpriv_jit_on_next_line,
&spec->unpriv.jited);
if (err)
goto cleanup;
spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
}
} else if ((msg = skip_dynamic_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_XLATED_PFX))) {
err = push_msg(msg, &spec->priv.expect_xlated);
if (err)
......@@ -459,16 +520,20 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_ARCH)) {
val = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_ARCH) - 1;
if (strcmp(val, "X86_64") == 0) {
arch_mask |= ARCH_X86_64;
arch = ARCH_X86_64;
} else if (strcmp(val, "ARM64") == 0) {
arch_mask |= ARCH_ARM64;
arch = ARCH_ARM64;
} else if (strcmp(val, "RISCV64") == 0) {
arch_mask |= ARCH_RISCV64;
arch = ARCH_RISCV64;
} else {
PRINT_FAIL("bad arch spec: '%s'", val);
err = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
arch_mask |= arch;
collect_jit = get_current_arch() == arch;
unpriv_jit_on_next_line = true;
jit_on_next_line = true;
} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_BTF_PATH)) {
spec->btf_custom_path = s + sizeof(TEST_BTF_PATH) - 1;
}
......@@ -521,6 +586,8 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
clone_msgs(&spec->priv.expect_msgs, &spec->unpriv.expect_msgs);
if (spec->unpriv.expect_xlated.cnt == 0)
clone_msgs(&spec->priv.expect_xlated, &spec->unpriv.expect_xlated);
if (spec->unpriv.jited.cnt == 0)
clone_msgs(&spec->priv.jited, &spec->unpriv.jited);
}
spec->valid = true;
......@@ -575,16 +642,29 @@ static void emit_xlated(const char *xlated, bool force)
fprintf(stdout, "XLATED:\n=============\n%s=============\n", xlated);
}
static void emit_jited(const char *jited, bool force)
{
if (!force && env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE)
return;
fprintf(stdout, "JITED:\n=============\n%s=============\n", jited);
}
static void validate_msgs(char *log_buf, struct expected_msgs *msgs,
void (*emit_fn)(const char *buf, bool force))
{
const char *log = log_buf, *prev_match;
regmatch_t reg_match[1];
const char *log = log_buf;
int prev_match_line;
int match_line;
int i, j, err;
prev_match_line = -1;
match_line = 0;
prev_match = log;
for (i = 0; i < msgs->cnt; i++) {
struct expect_msg *msg = &msgs->patterns[i];
const char *match = NULL;
const char *match = NULL, *pat_status;
bool wrong_line = false;
if (!msg->is_regex) {
match = strstr(log, msg->substr);
......@@ -598,19 +678,41 @@ static void validate_msgs(char *log_buf, struct expected_msgs *msgs,
}
}
if (!match) {
if (match) {
for (; prev_match < match; ++prev_match)
if (*prev_match == '\n')
++match_line;
wrong_line = msg->on_next_line && prev_match_line >= 0 &&
prev_match_line + 1 != match_line;
}
if (!match || wrong_line) {
PRINT_FAIL("expect_msg\n");
if (env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE)
emit_fn(log_buf, true /*force*/);
for (j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
msg = &msgs->patterns[j];
if (j < i)
pat_status = "MATCHED ";
else if (wrong_line)
pat_status = "WRONG LINE";
else
pat_status = "EXPECTED ";
msg = &msgs->patterns[j];
fprintf(stderr, "%s %s: '%s'\n",
j < i ? "MATCHED " : "EXPECTED",
pat_status,
msg->is_regex ? " REGEX" : "SUBSTR",
msg->substr);
}
return;
if (wrong_line) {
fprintf(stderr,
"expecting match at line %d, actual match is at line %d\n",
prev_match_line + 1, match_line);
}
break;
}
prev_match_line = match_line;
}
}
......@@ -769,20 +871,6 @@ static int get_xlated_program_text(int prog_fd, char *text, size_t text_sz)
return err;
}
static bool run_on_current_arch(int arch_mask)
{
if (arch_mask == 0)
return true;
#if defined(__x86_64__)
return arch_mask & ARCH_X86_64;
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
return arch_mask & ARCH_ARM64;
#elif defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64
return arch_mask & ARCH_RISCV64;
#endif
return false;
}
/* this function is forced noinline and has short generic name to look better
* in test_progs output (in case of a failure)
*/
......@@ -807,7 +895,7 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
if (!test__start_subtest(subspec->name))
return;
if (!run_on_current_arch(spec->arch_mask)) {
if ((get_current_arch() & spec->arch_mask) == 0) {
test__skip();
return;
}
......@@ -884,6 +972,21 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
validate_msgs(tester->log_buf, &subspec->expect_xlated, emit_xlated);
}
if (subspec->jited.cnt) {
err = get_jited_program_text(bpf_program__fd(tprog),
tester->log_buf, tester->log_buf_sz);
if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
printf("%s:SKIP: jited programs disassembly is not supported,\n", __func__);
printf("%s:SKIP: tests are built w/o LLVM development libs\n", __func__);
test__skip();
goto tobj_cleanup;
}
if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "get_jited_program_text"))
goto tobj_cleanup;
emit_jited(tester->log_buf, false /*force*/);
validate_msgs(tester->log_buf, &subspec->jited, emit_jited);
}
if (should_do_test_run(spec, subspec)) {
/* For some reason test_verifier executes programs
* with all capabilities restored. Do the same here.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment