Commit 7e201881 authored by Jacob Keller's avatar Jacob Keller Committed by Jeff Kirsher

i40e: remove duplicate pfc stats

The pfc related priority stats are already handled separately as these
stats are actually arrays of length I40E_MAX_USER_PRIORITY. Thus,
including them within i40e_gstrings_stats will just duplicate data.

Worse, the sizeof will be incorrect, as it will be the total size of the
stat arrays, which in this case is 8 * sizeof(u64), so we will only copy
the stat contents as if they were a u32.

Since we already correctly handle these stats else where, remove them
from the i40e_gstrings_stats.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAndrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent 0ded9c61
...@@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static const struct i40e_stats i40e_gstrings_stats[] = { ...@@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static const struct i40e_stats i40e_gstrings_stats[] = {
I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_rx", stats.link_xoff_rx), I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_rx", stats.link_xoff_rx),
I40E_PF_STAT("link_xon_tx", stats.link_xon_tx), I40E_PF_STAT("link_xon_tx", stats.link_xon_tx),
I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_tx", stats.link_xoff_tx), I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_tx", stats.link_xoff_tx),
I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xon_rx", stats.priority_xon_rx),
I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xoff_rx", stats.priority_xoff_rx),
I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xon_tx", stats.priority_xon_tx),
I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xoff_tx", stats.priority_xoff_tx),
I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_64", stats.rx_size_64), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_64", stats.rx_size_64),
I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_127", stats.rx_size_127), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_127", stats.rx_size_127),
I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_255", stats.rx_size_255), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_255", stats.rx_size_255),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment