Commit 81328d5c authored by Johan Hedberg's avatar Johan Hedberg Committed by Marcel Holtmann

Bluetooth: Unify remote OOB data functions

There's no need to duplicate code for the 192 vs 192+256 variants of the
OOB data functions. This is also helpful to pave the way to support LE
SC OOB data where only 256 bit data is provided.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent 903b71c7
......@@ -944,10 +944,8 @@ void hci_remote_oob_data_clear(struct hci_dev *hdev);
struct oob_data *hci_find_remote_oob_data(struct hci_dev *hdev,
bdaddr_t *bdaddr);
int hci_add_remote_oob_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
u8 *hash, u8 *rand);
int hci_add_remote_oob_ext_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
u8 *hash192, u8 *rand192,
u8 *hash256, u8 *rand256);
u8 *hash192, u8 *rand192,
u8 *hash256, u8 *rand256);
int hci_remove_remote_oob_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr);
void hci_event_packet(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb);
......
......@@ -3517,7 +3517,8 @@ void hci_remote_oob_data_clear(struct hci_dev *hdev)
}
int hci_add_remote_oob_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
u8 *hash, u8 *rand)
u8 *hash192, u8 *rand192,
u8 *hash256, u8 *rand256)
{
struct oob_data *data;
......@@ -3531,38 +3532,21 @@ int hci_add_remote_oob_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
list_add(&data->list, &hdev->remote_oob_data);
}
memcpy(data->hash192, hash, sizeof(data->hash192));
memcpy(data->rand192, rand, sizeof(data->rand192));
memset(data->hash256, 0, sizeof(data->hash256));
memset(data->rand256, 0, sizeof(data->rand256));
BT_DBG("%s for %pMR", hdev->name, bdaddr);
return 0;
}
int hci_add_remote_oob_ext_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
u8 *hash192, u8 *rand192,
u8 *hash256, u8 *rand256)
{
struct oob_data *data;
data = hci_find_remote_oob_data(hdev, bdaddr);
if (!data) {
data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data)
return -ENOMEM;
bacpy(&data->bdaddr, bdaddr);
list_add(&data->list, &hdev->remote_oob_data);
if (hash192 && rand192) {
memcpy(data->hash192, hash192, sizeof(data->hash192));
memcpy(data->rand192, rand192, sizeof(data->rand192));
} else {
memset(data->hash192, 0, sizeof(data->hash192));
memset(data->rand192, 0, sizeof(data->rand192));
}
memcpy(data->hash192, hash192, sizeof(data->hash192));
memcpy(data->rand192, rand192, sizeof(data->rand192));
memcpy(data->hash256, hash256, sizeof(data->hash256));
memcpy(data->rand256, rand256, sizeof(data->rand256));
if (hash256 && rand256) {
memcpy(data->hash256, hash256, sizeof(data->hash256));
memcpy(data->rand256, rand256, sizeof(data->rand256));
} else {
memset(data->hash256, 0, sizeof(data->hash256));
memset(data->rand256, 0, sizeof(data->rand256));
}
BT_DBG("%s for %pMR", hdev->name, bdaddr);
......
......@@ -3599,7 +3599,8 @@ static int add_remote_oob_data(struct sock *sk, struct hci_dev *hdev,
}
err = hci_add_remote_oob_data(hdev, &cp->addr.bdaddr,
cp->hash, cp->rand);
cp->hash, cp->rand,
NULL, NULL);
if (err < 0)
status = MGMT_STATUS_FAILED;
else
......@@ -3619,9 +3620,9 @@ static int add_remote_oob_data(struct sock *sk, struct hci_dev *hdev,
goto unlock;
}
err = hci_add_remote_oob_ext_data(hdev, &cp->addr.bdaddr,
cp->hash192, cp->rand192,
cp->hash256, cp->rand256);
err = hci_add_remote_oob_data(hdev, &cp->addr.bdaddr,
cp->hash192, cp->rand192,
cp->hash256, cp->rand256);
if (err < 0)
status = MGMT_STATUS_FAILED;
else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment