Commit 83929cce authored by Mike Galbraith's avatar Mike Galbraith Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment

Michael Kerrisk reported:

> Regarding the previous paragraph...  My tests indicate
> that writing *any* value to the autogroup [nice priority level]
> file causes the task group to get a lower priority.

Because autogroup didn't call the then meaningless scale_load()...

Autogroup nice level adjustment has been broken ever since load
resolution was increased for 64-bit kernels.  Use scale_load() to
scale group weight.

Michael Kerrisk tested this patch to fix the problem:

> Applied and tested against 4.9-rc6 on an Intel u7 (4 cores).
> Test setup:
>
> Terminal window 1: running 40 CPU burner jobs
> Terminal window 2: running 40 CPU burner jobs
> Terminal window 1: running  1 CPU burner job
>
> Demonstrated that:
> * Writing "0" to the autogroup file for TW1 now causes no change
>   to the rate at which the process on the terminal consume CPU.
> * Writing -20 to the autogroup file for TW1 caused those processes
>   to get the lion's share of CPU while TW2 TW3 get a tiny amount.
> * Writing -20 to the autogroup files for TW1 and TW3 allowed the
>   process on TW3 to get as much CPU as it was getting as when
>   the autogroup nice values for both terminals were 0.
Reported-by: default avatarMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479897217.4306.6.camel@gmx.deSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 10b9dd56
...@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice) ...@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
{ {
static unsigned long next = INITIAL_JIFFIES; static unsigned long next = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
struct autogroup *ag; struct autogroup *ag;
unsigned long shares;
int err; int err;
if (nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE) if (nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
...@@ -230,9 +231,10 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice) ...@@ -230,9 +231,10 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
next = HZ / 10 + jiffies; next = HZ / 10 + jiffies;
ag = autogroup_task_get(p); ag = autogroup_task_get(p);
shares = scale_load(sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]);
down_write(&ag->lock); down_write(&ag->lock);
err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]); err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, shares);
if (!err) if (!err)
ag->nice = nice; ag->nice = nice;
up_write(&ag->lock); up_write(&ag->lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment