Commit 8647ece4 authored by Kuniyuki Iwashima's avatar Kuniyuki Iwashima Committed by Paolo Abeni

af_unix: Define locking order for U_RECVQ_LOCK_EMBRYO in unix_collect_skb().

While GC is cleaning up cyclic references by SCM_RIGHTS,
unix_collect_skb() collects skb in the socket's recvq.

If the socket is TCP_LISTEN, we need to collect skb in the
embryo's queue.  Then, both the listener's recvq lock and
the embroy's one are held.

The locking is always done in the listener -> embryo order.

Let's define it as unix_recvq_lock_cmp_fn() instead of using
spin_lock_nested().

Note that the reverse order is defined for consistency.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
parent 7202cb59
......@@ -181,6 +181,25 @@ static int unix_state_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *_a,
/* unix_state_double_lock(): ascending address order. */
return cmp_ptr(a, b);
}
static int unix_recvq_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *_a,
const struct lockdep_map *_b)
{
const struct sock *a, *b;
a = container_of(_a, struct sock, sk_receive_queue.lock.dep_map);
b = container_of(_b, struct sock, sk_receive_queue.lock.dep_map);
/* unix_collect_skb(): listener -> embryo order. */
if (a->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN && unix_sk(b)->listener == a)
return -1;
/* Should never happen. Just to be symmetric. */
if (b->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN && unix_sk(a)->listener == b)
return 1;
return 0;
}
#endif
static unsigned int unix_unbound_hash(struct sock *sk)
......@@ -1028,6 +1047,8 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern,
sk->sk_write_space = unix_write_space;
sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = READ_ONCE(net->unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen);
sk->sk_destruct = unix_sock_destructor;
lock_set_cmp_fn(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, unix_recvq_lock_cmp_fn, NULL);
u = unix_sk(sk);
u->listener = NULL;
u->vertex = NULL;
......
......@@ -337,11 +337,6 @@ static bool unix_vertex_dead(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
return true;
}
enum unix_recv_queue_lock_class {
U_RECVQ_LOCK_NORMAL,
U_RECVQ_LOCK_EMBRYO,
};
static void unix_collect_queue(struct unix_sock *u, struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
{
skb_queue_splice_init(&u->sk.sk_receive_queue, hitlist);
......@@ -375,8 +370,7 @@ static void unix_collect_skb(struct list_head *scc, struct sk_buff_head *hitlist
skb_queue_walk(queue, skb) {
struct sk_buff_head *embryo_queue = &skb->sk->sk_receive_queue;
/* listener -> embryo order, the inversion never happens. */
spin_lock_nested(&embryo_queue->lock, U_RECVQ_LOCK_EMBRYO);
spin_lock(&embryo_queue->lock);
unix_collect_queue(unix_sk(skb->sk), hitlist);
spin_unlock(&embryo_queue->lock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment