ksmbd: fix possible deadlock in smb2_open
[ 8743.393379] ====================================================== [ 8743.393385] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 8743.393391] 6.4.0-rc1+ #11 Tainted: G OE [ 8743.393397] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 8743.393402] kworker/0:2/12921 is trying to acquire lock: [ 8743.393408] ffff888127a14460 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_setxattr+0x3d/0xd0 [ksmbd] [ 8743.393510] but task is already holding lock: [ 8743.393515] ffff8880360d97f0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_locked+0x181/0x670 [ksmbd] [ 8743.393618] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 8743.393623] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 8743.393628] -> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 8743.393648] down_write_nested+0x9a/0x1b0 [ 8743.393660] filename_create+0x128/0x270 [ 8743.393670] do_mkdirat+0xab/0x1f0 [ 8743.393680] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x47/0x60 [ 8743.393690] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90 [ 8743.393701] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [ 8743.393711] -> #0 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 8743.393728] __lock_acquire+0x2201/0x3b80 [ 8743.393737] lock_acquire+0x18f/0x440 [ 8743.393746] mnt_want_write+0x5f/0x240 [ 8743.393755] ksmbd_vfs_setxattr+0x3d/0xd0 [ksmbd] [ 8743.393839] ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr+0xcc/0x110 [ksmbd] [ 8743.393924] compat_ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr+0x39/0x50 [ksmbd] [ 8743.394010] smb2_open+0x3432/0x3cc0 [ksmbd] [ 8743.394099] handle_ksmbd_work+0x2c9/0x7b0 [ksmbd] [ 8743.394187] process_one_work+0x65a/0xb30 [ 8743.394198] worker_thread+0x2cf/0x700 [ 8743.394209] kthread+0x1ad/0x1f0 [ 8743.394218] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 This patch add mnt_want_write() above parent inode lock and remove nested mnt_want_write calls in smb2_open(). Fixes: 40b268d3 ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Marios Makassikis <mmakassikis@freebox.fr> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment