Commit 868f036f authored by Dan Williams's avatar Dan Williams

libnvdimm: fix mishandled nvdimm_clear_poison() return value

Colin, via static analysis, reports that the length could be negative
from nvdimm_clear_poison() in the error case. There was a similar
problem with commit 0a3f27b9 "libnvdimm, namespace: avoid multiple
sector calculations" that I noticed when merging the for-4.10/libnvdimm
topic branch into libnvdimm-for-next, but I missed this one. Fix both of
them to the following procedure:

* if we clear a block's worth of media, clear that many blocks in
  badblocks

* if we clear less than the requested size of the transfer return an
  error

* always invalidate cache after any non-error / non-zero
  nvdimm_clear_poison result

Fixes: 82bf1037 ("libnvdimm: check and clear poison before writing to pmem")
Fixes: 0a3f27b9 ("libnvdimm, namespace: avoid multiple sector calculations")
Cc: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
parent 9cf8bd52
...@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ static int nsio_rw_bytes(struct nd_namespace_common *ndns, ...@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ static int nsio_rw_bytes(struct nd_namespace_common *ndns,
long cleared; long cleared;
cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(&ndns->dev, offset, size); cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(&ndns->dev, offset, size);
if (cleared != size) { if (cleared < size)
size = cleared;
rc = -EIO; rc = -EIO;
if (cleared > 0 && cleared / 512) {
cleared /= 512;
badblocks_clear(&nsio->bb, sector, cleared);
} }
invalidate_pmem(nsio->addr + offset, size);
badblocks_clear(&nsio->bb, sector, cleared >> 9);
} else } else
rc = -EIO; rc = -EIO;
} }
......
...@@ -47,22 +47,29 @@ static struct nd_region *to_region(struct pmem_device *pmem) ...@@ -47,22 +47,29 @@ static struct nd_region *to_region(struct pmem_device *pmem)
return to_nd_region(to_dev(pmem)->parent); return to_nd_region(to_dev(pmem)->parent);
} }
static void pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset, static int pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset,
unsigned int len) unsigned int len)
{ {
struct device *dev = to_dev(pmem); struct device *dev = to_dev(pmem);
sector_t sector, cleared; sector_t sector;
long cleared;
int rc = 0;
sector = (offset - pmem->data_offset) / 512; sector = (offset - pmem->data_offset) / 512;
cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(dev, pmem->phys_addr + offset, len) / 512;
if (cleared) { cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(dev, pmem->phys_addr + offset, len);
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: %#llx clear %ld sector%s\n", if (cleared < len)
__func__, (unsigned long long) sector, rc = -EIO;
cleared, cleared > 1 ? "s" : ""); if (cleared > 0 && cleared / 512) {
cleared /= 512;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: %#llx clear %ld sector%s\n", __func__,
(unsigned long long) sector, cleared,
cleared > 1 ? "s" : "");
badblocks_clear(&pmem->bb, sector, cleared); badblocks_clear(&pmem->bb, sector, cleared);
} }
invalidate_pmem(pmem->virt_addr + offset, len); invalidate_pmem(pmem->virt_addr + offset, len);
return rc;
} }
static void write_pmem(void *pmem_addr, struct page *page, static void write_pmem(void *pmem_addr, struct page *page,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment