Commit 88faba20 authored by Vladimir Oltean's avatar Vladimir Oltean Committed by David S. Miller

net: dsa: targeted MTU notifiers should only match on one port

dsa_slave_change_mtu() calls dsa_port_mtu_change() twice:
- it sends a cross-chip notifier with the MTU of the CPU port which is
  used to update the DSA links.
- it sends one targeted MTU notifier which is supposed to only match the
  user port on which we are changing the MTU. The "propagate_upstream"
  variable is used here to bypass the cross-chip notifier system from
  switch.c

But due to a mistake, the second, targeted notifier matches not only on
the user port, but also on the DSA link which is a member of the same
switch, if that exists.

And because the DSA links of the entire dst were programmed in a
previous round to the largest_mtu via a "propagate_upstream == true"
notification, then the dsa_port_mtu_change(propagate_upstream == false)
call that is immediately upcoming will break the MTU on the one DSA link
which is chip-wise local to the dp whose MTU is changing right now.

Example given this daisy chain topology:

   sw0p0     sw0p1     sw0p2     sw0p3     sw0p4
[  cpu  ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  user ]
[   x   ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ] [       ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw1p0     sw1p1     sw1p2     sw1p3     sw1p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ]

ip link set sw0p1 mtu 9000
ip link set sw1p1 mtu 9000 # at this stage, sw0p1 and sw1p1 can talk
                           # to one another using jumbo frames
ip link set sw0p2 mtu 1500 # this programs the sw0p3 DSA link first to
                           # the largest_mtu of 9000, then reprograms it to
                           # 1500 with the "propagate_upstream == false"
                           # notifier, breaking communication between
                           # sw0p1 and sw1p1

To escape from this situation, make the targeted match really match on a
single port - the user port, and rename the "propagate_upstream"
variable to "targeted_match" to clarify the intention and avoid future
issues.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4e4ab795
......@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct dsa_notifier_vlan_info {
/* DSA_NOTIFIER_MTU */
struct dsa_notifier_mtu_info {
bool propagate_upstream;
bool targeted_match;
int sw_index;
int port;
int mtu;
......@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_port *dp, bool vlan_filtering,
bool dsa_port_skip_vlan_configuration(struct dsa_port *dp);
int dsa_port_ageing_time(struct dsa_port *dp, clock_t ageing_clock);
int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int new_mtu,
bool propagate_upstream);
bool targeted_match);
int dsa_port_fdb_add(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
u16 vid);
int dsa_port_fdb_del(struct dsa_port *dp, const unsigned char *addr,
......
......@@ -567,11 +567,11 @@ int dsa_port_mrouter(struct dsa_port *dp, bool mrouter,
}
int dsa_port_mtu_change(struct dsa_port *dp, int new_mtu,
bool propagate_upstream)
bool targeted_match)
{
struct dsa_notifier_mtu_info info = {
.sw_index = dp->ds->index,
.propagate_upstream = propagate_upstream,
.targeted_match = targeted_match,
.port = dp->index,
.mtu = new_mtu,
};
......
......@@ -1586,14 +1586,15 @@ int dsa_slave_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
goto out_master_failed;
/* We only need to propagate the MTU of the CPU port to
* upstream switches.
* upstream switches, so create a non-targeted notifier which
* updates all switches.
*/
err = dsa_port_mtu_change(cpu_dp, cpu_mtu, true);
err = dsa_port_mtu_change(cpu_dp, cpu_mtu, false);
if (err)
goto out_cpu_failed;
}
err = dsa_port_mtu_change(dp, new_mtu, false);
err = dsa_port_mtu_change(dp, new_mtu, true);
if (err)
goto out_port_failed;
......@@ -1607,7 +1608,7 @@ int dsa_slave_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
if (new_master_mtu != old_master_mtu)
dsa_port_mtu_change(cpu_dp, old_master_mtu -
dsa_tag_protocol_overhead(cpu_dp->tag_ops),
true);
false);
out_cpu_failed:
if (new_master_mtu != old_master_mtu)
dev_set_mtu(master, old_master_mtu);
......
......@@ -52,10 +52,13 @@ static int dsa_switch_ageing_time(struct dsa_switch *ds,
static bool dsa_switch_mtu_match(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
struct dsa_notifier_mtu_info *info)
{
if (ds->index == info->sw_index)
return (port == info->port) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port);
if (ds->index == info->sw_index && port == info->port)
return true;
if (!info->propagate_upstream)
/* Do not propagate to other switches in the tree if the notifier was
* targeted for a single switch.
*/
if (info->targeted_match)
return false;
if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment