Commit 8a803040 authored by Julian Anastasov's avatar Julian Anastasov Committed by Patrick McHardy

ipvs: make rerouting optional with snat_reroute

	Add new sysctl flag "snat_reroute". Recent kernels use
ip_route_me_harder() to route LVS-NAT responses properly by
VIP when there are multiple paths to client. But setups
that do not have alternative default routes can skip this
routing lookup by using snat_reroute=0.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
parent f4bc17cd
......@@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ extern int sysctl_ip_vs_expire_quiescent_template;
extern int sysctl_ip_vs_sync_threshold[2];
extern int sysctl_ip_vs_nat_icmp_send;
extern int sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack;
extern int sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute;
extern struct ip_vs_stats ip_vs_stats;
extern const struct ctl_path net_vs_ctl_path[];
......
......@@ -929,12 +929,22 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
ip_send_check(ip_hdr(skb));
}
/*
* nf_iterate does not expect change in the skb->dst->dev.
* It looks like it is not fatal to enable this code for hooks
* where our handlers are at the end of the chain list and
* when all next handlers use skb->dst->dev and not outdev.
* It will definitely route properly the inout NAT traffic
* when multiple paths are used.
*/
/* For policy routing, packets originating from this
* machine itself may be routed differently to packets
* passing through. We want this packet to be routed as
* if it came from this machine itself. So re-compute
* the routing information.
*/
if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute) {
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
if (af == AF_INET6) {
if (ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
......@@ -943,6 +953,7 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
#endif
if (ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
goto drop;
}
IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
......@@ -991,8 +1002,13 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6)) {
int related, verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp_v6(skb, &related);
if (related)
if (related) {
if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
ip6_route_me_harder(skb))
verdict = NF_DROP;
return verdict;
}
ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
}
} else
......@@ -1000,8 +1016,13 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)) {
int related, verdict = ip_vs_out_icmp(skb, &related);
if (related)
if (related) {
if (sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute &&
NF_ACCEPT == verdict &&
ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL))
verdict = NF_DROP;
return verdict;
}
ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
}
......
......@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ int sysctl_ip_vs_nat_icmp_send = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_NFCT
int sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack;
#endif
int sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute = 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG
......@@ -1599,6 +1600,13 @@ static struct ctl_table vs_vars[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_do_defense_mode,
},
{
.procname = "snat_reroute",
.data = &sysctl_ip_vs_snat_reroute,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
},
#if 0
{
.procname = "timeout_established",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment