vmscan: remove obsolete shrink_control comment

09f363c7 ("vmscan: fix shrinker callback bug in fs/super.c") fixed a
shrinker callback which was returning -1 when nr_to_scan is zero, which
caused excessive slab scanning.  But 635697c6 ("vmscan: fix initial
shrinker size handling") fixed the problem, again so we can freely return
-1 although nr_to_scan is zero.  So let's revert 09f363c7 because the
comment added in 09f363c7 made an unnecessary rule.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fs/super.c

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 		return -1;
 
 	if (!grab_super_passive(sb))
-		return !sc->nr_to_scan ? 0 : -1;
+		return -1;
 
 	if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
 		fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);

include/linux/shrinker.h

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ struct shrink_control {
  * 'nr_to_scan' entries and attempt to free them up.  It should return
  * the number of objects which remain in the cache.  If it returns -1, it means
  * it cannot do any scanning at this time (eg. there is a risk of deadlock).
- * The callback must not return -1 if nr_to_scan is zero.
  *
  * The 'gfpmask' refers to the allocation we are currently trying to
  * fulfil.