Commit 9096e36d authored by Stanislav Lisovskiy's avatar Stanislav Lisovskiy

drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config

We currently always exit that bpp loop because
drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots doesn't care if we actually
can fit those or not.
I think that wasn't the initial intention here, especially when
we keep trying with lower bpps, we are supposed to keep trying
until we actually find some _working_ configuration, which isn't the
case here.
So added that drm_dp_mst_check here, so that we can make sure
that try all the bpps before we fail.
Reviewed-by: default avatarVinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221101094222.22091-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
parent 1482ec00
......@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
int ret = 0;
mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
......@@ -85,9 +86,20 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
connector->port, crtc_state->pbn);
if (slots == -EDEADLK)
return slots;
if (slots >= 0)
if (slots >= 0) {
ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(state);
/*
* If we got slots >= 0 and we can fit those based on check
* then we can exit the loop. Otherwise keep trying.
*/
if (!ret)
break;
}
}
/* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
if (ret && slots >= 0)
slots = ret;
if (slots < 0) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "failed finding vcpi slots:%d\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment