Commit 90c4ae4e authored by Vishwanath Pai's avatar Vishwanath Pai Committed by Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: xt_hashlimit: fix build error caused by 64bit division

64bit division causes build/link errors on 32bit architectures. It
prints out error messages like:

ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.ko] undefined!

The value of avg passed through by userspace in BYTE mode cannot exceed
U32_MAX. Which means 64bit division in user2rate_bytes is unnecessary.
To fix this I have changed the type of param 'user' to u32.

Since anything greater than U32_MAX is an invalid input we error out in
hashlimit_mt_check_common() when this is the case.

Changes in v2:
	Making return type as u32 would cause an overflow for small
	values of 'user' (for example 2, 3 etc). To avoid this I bumped up
	'r' to u64 again as well as the return type. This is OK since the
	variable that stores the result is u64. We still avoid 64bit
	division here since 'user' is u32.

Fixes: bea74641 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: add rate match mode")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVishwanath Pai <vpai@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
parent 05d0eae7
...@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ ...@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h> #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h>
#include <linux/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.h> #include <linux/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>");
...@@ -527,12 +528,12 @@ static u64 user2rate(u64 user) ...@@ -527,12 +528,12 @@ static u64 user2rate(u64 user)
} }
} }
static u64 user2rate_bytes(u64 user) static u64 user2rate_bytes(u32 user)
{ {
u64 r; u64 r;
r = user ? 0xFFFFFFFFULL / user : 0xFFFFFFFFULL; r = user ? U32_MAX / user : U32_MAX;
r = (r - 1) << 4; r = (r - 1) << XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTE_SHIFT;
return r; return r;
} }
...@@ -588,7 +589,8 @@ static void rateinfo_init(struct dsthash_ent *dh, ...@@ -588,7 +589,8 @@ static void rateinfo_init(struct dsthash_ent *dh,
dh->rateinfo.prev_window = 0; dh->rateinfo.prev_window = 0;
dh->rateinfo.current_rate = 0; dh->rateinfo.current_rate = 0;
if (hinfo->cfg.mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES) { if (hinfo->cfg.mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES) {
dh->rateinfo.rate = user2rate_bytes(hinfo->cfg.avg); dh->rateinfo.rate =
user2rate_bytes((u32)hinfo->cfg.avg);
if (hinfo->cfg.burst) if (hinfo->cfg.burst)
dh->rateinfo.burst = dh->rateinfo.burst =
hinfo->cfg.burst * dh->rateinfo.rate; hinfo->cfg.burst * dh->rateinfo.rate;
...@@ -870,7 +872,7 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par, ...@@ -870,7 +872,7 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,
/* Check for overflow. */ /* Check for overflow. */
if (revision >= 3 && cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH) { if (revision >= 3 && cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_RATE_MATCH) {
if (cfg->avg == 0) { if (cfg->avg == 0 || cfg->avg > U32_MAX) {
pr_info("hashlimit invalid rate\n"); pr_info("hashlimit invalid rate\n");
return -ERANGE; return -ERANGE;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment