Commit 928f0cd0 authored by Imre Deak's avatar Imre Deak

drm/i915/snb+: Remove incorrect forcewake check in debugfs/i915_drpc_info

FORCEWAKE_ACK is depricated by BSpec at least starting from BDW,
referring to the multi-threaded version of it instead. Accessing
FORCEWAKE_ACK triggers an unclaimed register access error - at
least on GLK - see the Reference: below.

The correct registers to use would be FORCEWAKE_MT_ACK on IVB+ and
FORCEWAKE_ACK_RENDER_GEN9 on SKL+ like it's done elsewhere in the
driver.

The forcewake check itself is inconsistent and redundant, since there
could be other forcewake requesters besides the kernel (being the
multithreaded version of the register) and the kernel's per-domain
forcewake counters are shown anyway at the end of the file. So let's
just remove the check.
Suggested-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103337Signed-off-by: default avatarImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208112331.12986-1-imre.deak@intel.com
parent 8e47b4b6
...@@ -1461,19 +1461,6 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m) ...@@ -1461,19 +1461,6 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private); struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
u32 gt_core_status, rcctl1, rc6vids = 0; u32 gt_core_status, rcctl1, rc6vids = 0;
u32 gen9_powergate_enable = 0, gen9_powergate_status = 0; u32 gen9_powergate_enable = 0, gen9_powergate_status = 0;
unsigned forcewake_count;
int count = 0;
forcewake_count = READ_ONCE(dev_priv->uncore.fw_domain[FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER].wake_count);
if (forcewake_count) {
seq_puts(m, "RC information inaccurate because somebody "
"holds a forcewake reference \n");
} else {
/* NB: we cannot use forcewake, else we read the wrong values */
while (count++ < 50 && (I915_READ_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_ACK) & 1))
udelay(10);
seq_printf(m, "RC information accurate: %s\n", yesno(count < 51));
}
gt_core_status = I915_READ_FW(GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS); gt_core_status = I915_READ_FW(GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS);
trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4, true); trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4, true);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment