Commit 936184ea authored by Ryusuke Konishi's avatar Ryusuke Konishi Committed by Andrew Morton

nilfs2: fix unexpected freezing of nilfs_segctor_sync()

A potential and reproducible race issue has been identified where
nilfs_segctor_sync() would block even after the log writer thread writes a
checkpoint, unless there is an interrupt or other trigger to resume log
writing.

This turned out to be because, depending on the execution timing of the
log writer thread running in parallel, the log writer thread may skip
responding to nilfs_segctor_sync(), which causes a call to schedule()
waiting for completion within nilfs_segctor_sync() to lose the opportunity
to wake up.

The reason why waking up the task waiting in nilfs_segctor_sync() may be
skipped is that updating the request generation issued using a shared
sequence counter and adding an wait queue entry to the request wait queue
to the log writer, are not done atomically.  There is a possibility that
log writing and request completion notification by nilfs_segctor_wakeup()
may occur between the two operations, and in that case, the wait queue
entry is not yet visible to nilfs_segctor_wakeup() and the wake-up of
nilfs_segctor_sync() will be carried over until the next request occurs.

Fix this issue by performing these two operations simultaneously within
the lock section of sc_state_lock.  Also, following the memory barrier
guidelines for event waiting loops, move the call to set_current_state()
in the same location into the event waiting loop to ensure that a memory
barrier is inserted just before the event condition determination.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240520132621.4054-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 9ff05123 ("nilfs2: segment constructor")
Signed-off-by: default avatarRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Bai, Shuangpeng" <sjb7183@psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent f5d4e046
......@@ -2168,19 +2168,28 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_sync(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci)
struct nilfs_segctor_wait_request wait_req;
int err = 0;
spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
init_wait(&wait_req.wq);
wait_req.err = 0;
atomic_set(&wait_req.done, 0);
init_waitqueue_entry(&wait_req.wq, current);
/*
* To prevent a race issue where completion notifications from the
* log writer thread are missed, increment the request sequence count
* "sc_seq_request" and insert a wait queue entry using the current
* sequence number into the "sc_wait_request" queue at the same time
* within the lock section of "sc_state_lock".
*/
spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
wait_req.seq = ++sci->sc_seq_request;
add_wait_queue(&sci->sc_wait_request, &wait_req.wq);
spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
init_waitqueue_entry(&wait_req.wq, current);
add_wait_queue(&sci->sc_wait_request, &wait_req.wq);
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
wake_up(&sci->sc_wait_daemon);
for (;;) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (atomic_read(&wait_req.done)) {
err = wait_req.err;
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment