Commit 93dbed91 authored by Andy Gross's avatar Andy Gross

soc: qcom: smd: Use correct remote processor ID

This patch fixes SMEM addressing issues when remote processors need to use
secure SMEM partitions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
parent 18912806
......@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The edge is described by the following properties:
Definition: the identifier of the remote processor in the smd channel
allocation table
- qcom,remote-pid:
Usage: optional
Value type: <u32>
Definition: the identifier for the remote processor as known by the rest
of the system.
= SMD DEVICES
In turn, subnodes of the "edges" represent devices tied to SMD channels on that
......
......@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static const struct {
* @smd: handle to qcom_smd
* @of_node: of_node handle for information related to this edge
* @edge_id: identifier of this edge
* @remote_pid: identifier of remote processor
* @irq: interrupt for signals on this edge
* @ipc_regmap: regmap handle holding the outgoing ipc register
* @ipc_offset: offset within @ipc_regmap of the register for ipc
......@@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_edge {
struct qcom_smd *smd;
struct device_node *of_node;
unsigned edge_id;
unsigned remote_pid;
int irq;
......@@ -572,7 +574,7 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_smd_edge_intr(int irq, void *data)
* have to scan if the amount of available space in smem have changed
* since last scan.
*/
available = qcom_smem_get_free_space(edge->edge_id);
available = qcom_smem_get_free_space(edge->remote_pid);
if (available != edge->smem_available) {
edge->smem_available = available;
edge->need_rescan = true;
......@@ -976,7 +978,8 @@ static struct qcom_smd_channel *qcom_smd_create_channel(struct qcom_smd_edge *ed
spin_lock_init(&channel->recv_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&channel->fblockread_event);
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->edge_id, smem_info_item, (void **)&info, &info_size);
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->remote_pid, smem_info_item, (void **)&info,
&info_size);
if (ret)
goto free_name_and_channel;
......@@ -997,7 +1000,8 @@ static struct qcom_smd_channel *qcom_smd_create_channel(struct qcom_smd_edge *ed
goto free_name_and_channel;
}
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->edge_id, smem_fifo_item, &fifo_base, &fifo_size);
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->remote_pid, smem_fifo_item, &fifo_base,
&fifo_size);
if (ret)
goto free_name_and_channel;
......@@ -1041,7 +1045,7 @@ static void qcom_discover_channels(struct qcom_smd_edge *edge)
int i;
for (tbl = 0; tbl < SMD_ALLOC_TBL_COUNT; tbl++) {
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->edge_id,
ret = qcom_smem_get(edge->remote_pid,
smem_items[tbl].alloc_tbl_id,
(void **)&alloc_tbl,
NULL);
......@@ -1184,6 +1188,10 @@ static int qcom_smd_parse_edge(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
edge->remote_pid = QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY;
key = "qcom,remote-pid";
of_property_read_u32(node, key, &edge->remote_pid);
syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "qcom,ipc", 0);
if (!syscon_np) {
dev_err(dev, "no qcom,ipc node\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment