Commit 995998eb authored by Ricardo Neri's avatar Ricardo Neri Committed by Peter Zijlstra

x86/sched: Remove SD_ASYM_PACKING from the SMT domain flags

There is no difference between any of the SMT siblings of a physical core.
Do not do asym_packing load balancing at this level.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRicardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: default avatarZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406203148.19182-11-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
parent ca528cc5
...@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int x86_core_flags(void) ...@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int x86_core_flags(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
static int x86_smt_flags(void) static int x86_smt_flags(void)
{ {
return cpu_smt_flags() | x86_sched_itmt_flags(); return cpu_smt_flags();
} }
#endif #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment