Commit 9a2a0d3c authored by Vitaly Kuznetsov's avatar Vitaly Kuznetsov Committed by Paolo Bonzini

kvm: x86/mmu: Fix get_mmio_spte() on CPUs supporting 5-level PT

Commit 95fb5b02 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU") caused
the following WARNING on an Intel Ice Lake CPU:

 get_mmio_spte: detect reserved bits on spte, addr 0xb80a0, dump hierarchy:
 ------ spte 0xb80a0 level 5.
 ------ spte 0xfcd210107 level 4.
 ------ spte 0x1004c40107 level 3.
 ------ spte 0x1004c41107 level 2.
 ------ spte 0x1db00000000b83b6 level 1.
 WARNING: CPU: 109 PID: 10254 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:3569 kvm_mmu_page_fault.cold.150+0x54/0x22f [kvm]
...
 Call Trace:
  ? kvm_io_bus_get_first_dev+0x55/0x110 [kvm]
  vcpu_enter_guest+0xaa1/0x16a0 [kvm]
  ? vmx_get_cs_db_l_bits+0x17/0x30 [kvm_intel]
  ? skip_emulated_instruction+0xaa/0x150 [kvm_intel]
  kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xca/0x520 [kvm]

The guest triggering this crashes. Note, this happens with the traditional
MMU and EPT enabled, not with the newly introduced TDP MMU. Turns out,
there was a subtle change in the above mentioned commit. Previously,
walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte() was setting 'root' to 'iterator.level'
which is returned by shadow_walk_init() and this equals to
'vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level'. Now, get_mmio_spte() sets it to
'int root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level'.

The difference between 'root_level' and 'shadow_root_level' on CPUs
supporting 5-level page tables is that in some case we don't want to
use 5-level, in particular when 'cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu) <= 48'
kvm_mmu_get_tdp_level() returns '4'. In case upper layer is not used,
the corresponding SPTE will fail '__is_rsvd_bits_set()' check.

Revert to using 'shadow_root_level'.

Fixes: 95fb5b02 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201126110206.2118959-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 71cc849b
...@@ -3517,7 +3517,7 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep) ...@@ -3517,7 +3517,7 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
{ {
u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL]; u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL];
struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check; struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check;
int root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level; int root = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
int leaf; int leaf;
int level; int level;
bool reserved = false; bool reserved = false;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment