sh: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit

Follows the powerpc change, for much the same rationale.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

arch/sh/kernel/irq.c

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/ftrace.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/machvec.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -268,8 +269,7 @@ void migrate_irqs(void)
 			unsigned int newcpu = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity,
 							      cpu_online_mask);
 			if (newcpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
-				if (printk_ratelimit())
-					printk(KERN_INFO "IRQ%u no longer affine to CPU%u\n",
+				pr_info_ratelimited("IRQ%u no longer affine to CPU%u\n",
 						    irq, cpu);
 
 				cpumask_setall(data->affinity);

arch/sh/mm/alignment.c

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <asm/alignment.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 
@@ -95,13 +96,13 @@ int set_unalign_ctl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int val)
 void unaligned_fixups_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, insn_size_t insn,
 			     struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	if (user_mode(regs) && (se_usermode & UM_WARN) && printk_ratelimit())
-		pr_notice("Fixing up unaligned userspace access "
+	if (user_mode(regs) && (se_usermode & UM_WARN))
+		pr_notice_ratelimited("Fixing up unaligned userspace access "
 			  "in \"%s\" pid=%d pc=0x%p ins=0x%04hx\n",
 			  tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
 			  (void *)instruction_pointer(regs), insn);
-	else if (se_kernmode_warn && printk_ratelimit())
-		pr_notice("Fixing up unaligned kernel access "
+	else if (se_kernmode_warn)
+		pr_notice_ratelimited("Fixing up unaligned kernel access "
 			  "in \"%s\" pid=%d pc=0x%p ins=0x%04hx\n",
 			  tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
 			  (void *)instruction_pointer(regs), insn);